I'm giving away another trade secret here, although this isn't much of a secret. Actually just pointing out the obvious.
If you are optimizing as a 1 lot, then your optimization is likely not a good choice across a diversified portfolio. The reason is that the trades are completely skewed toward markets that have big $ moves per contract. So, really you are skewing your results toward currencies, bonds, etc. while you are practically ignoring some beautifully trending markets like corn and eurodollars. This leads to a chcken and egg debate because you need a system to apply money management to, but you need money management to develop a system.
On the bright side, I ran some tests on Murray's system (using the handy-dandy features of TradersStudio) and for this system the "best" answer might be a bit different but isn't going to make much difference. Very robust.
Xephen
If you are optimizing as a 1 lot, then your optimization is likely not a good choice across a diversified portfolio. The reason is that the trades are completely skewed toward markets that have big $ moves per contract. So, really you are skewing your results toward currencies, bonds, etc. while you are practically ignoring some beautifully trending markets like corn and eurodollars. This leads to a chcken and egg debate because you need a system to apply money management to, but you need money management to develop a system.
On the bright side, I ran some tests on Murray's system (using the handy-dandy features of TradersStudio) and for this system the "best" answer might be a bit different but isn't going to make much difference. Very robust.
Xephen