Dumb money will always try to find a cheap way to profit-bring it- I like being subsidised
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228289846_Why_are_Put_Options_So_ExpensiveIdiots trade naked-and just because QE has held the fake markets up for so long does not mean they won't crash and hit the skids for a decade or two. The global economy is BS- so much debt and money printing nobody knows what's real any more, and the market does not need another who dilutes option prices even further. Do something intelligent and productive
Everyone doesI like being subsidised


I second this approach. Challenge is to set a large number of trades to distribute the risk. Needs a large pipeline and a low cost broker.Instead of naked puts, try selling vertical spreads. Less profit, but time works for you. Maybe the same system that doesn't work with naked puts would work with vertical spreads...
Consider this more of an academic exercise about trading system development than anything else for now. If the results look good then I'll think about viability.
RedDuke and ironchef--I have option analytics software that gives me backtesting data to 2001.
Handle123--requirements are significantly lower in a margin account.
I want to focus specifically on how to conduct the backtest and I'll fill in a couple blanks. First, I will enter on every trading day because I want a large sample size. Second, I will sell the first put under X delta to keep probability of profit constant throughout the 15+ year sample. Third, I will exit when premium drops under $0.30 or just before the close on the final trading day. Fourth, this will be a daily backtest and I will collect all data at 15:30 ET.
Any further suggestions would be appreciated.
I second this approach. Challenge is to set a large number of trades to distribute the risk. Needs a large pipeline and a low cost broker.
Wouldn't like going into a naked trade without position sizing. It is too risky.
...
(2) Limiting maximum loss per trade to less than 0.1% to 0.5% of Overall Position Size Limit.
What was your definition of position sizing?
- For Nakeds establishing maximum loss is tricky. One could establish that max loss to be 2 Standard Deviations away from current price.
- For defined risk trades this is not an issue.