Desperately seeking SUSY

If the conclusions are true, scientists would need a new leading candidate for the "theory of everything."


FV Model ???
 
Quote from shortie:

If the conclusions are true, scientists would need a new leading candidate for the "theory of everything."


FV Model ???
:D
 
Interesting video. Has a more human feel to it than most:

<object width="416" height="374" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" id="ep"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="movie" value="http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/.element/apps/cvp/3.0/swf/cnn_416x234_embed.swf?context=embed&videoId=us/2011/05/10/vbs.motherboard.big.bang.VBS" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><embed src="http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/.element/apps/cvp/3.0/swf/cnn_416x234_embed.swf?context=embed&videoId=us/2011/05/10/vbs.motherboard.big.bang.VBS" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" bgcolor="#000000" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="416" wmode="transparent" height="374"></embed></object>
 
can this type of analysis, looking into matter describe what humans experience under meditiation or after LSD/DMT?

are the worlds percieved during these altered states of mind in any way connected to matter/strings/whatever particle ?

probably not......
 
Quote from DT-waw:

can this type of analysis, looking into matter describe what humans experience under meditiation or after LSD/DMT?

are the worlds percieved during these altered states of mind in any way connected to matter/strings/whatever particle ?

probably not......
Never say never, but almost certainly not. One thing that is becoming clearer, is that ensembles of things have emergent properties that the individual things do not. So in order to understand human beings, we need to study biology, psychology, neurology etc, and probably even higher level systems that may not even be invented yet, not physics.
 
Back
Top