I zipped through the trades and I annotated the segments as black (long) and red (short).
I am pleased to see that we can do trading suppression using a signal genrator (the volume 50%).
The great thing that shows up is the chop stuff I mentioned before. These are the adjacent bar trades that give up the volatility of the bar involved.
For past indicator traders, you will recognize how doing icebergs on the STOCH14 worked to eliminate the whipsaw.
There is a good example of four o'clock drift on low volume (see the slow downward price with low volatility bars with high overlap.
We will stick with indicator and volume coding and NOT do any staight PA coding for the time being.
The annotation names you use on the chart are terrific.
As simple developmental analytical technique is to use a matrix.
there are two axis and for some reason the typewriter dominance got put into PC's rather than the science of time based analysis. So I vote for letting time show as a vertical dimension going down and placing the variables in columns.
Since we are binary there need be only a few null hypothesis columns for each indicator relative to their locations (chosen signal settings) as go/no goes.
Most logic can be done with "AND's, OR's, Inverters and clocks that count either way (the bi-stable multi-vibrator).
Luckily coding has so many different instructions, we can bypass the simple stuff with instructions and just go to the suppression circuitry which so far does not have simple code named instructions.
One note. If you invert the positive output of an AND or an OR, you do NOT get the opposite logic output of the negative out put of an AND or OR. Since we have shown two five legged AND's on the first demo post, this is a consideration for keeping out of induction.
I am pleased to see that we can do trading suppression using a signal genrator (the volume 50%).
The great thing that shows up is the chop stuff I mentioned before. These are the adjacent bar trades that give up the volatility of the bar involved.
For past indicator traders, you will recognize how doing icebergs on the STOCH14 worked to eliminate the whipsaw.
There is a good example of four o'clock drift on low volume (see the slow downward price with low volatility bars with high overlap.
We will stick with indicator and volume coding and NOT do any staight PA coding for the time being.
The annotation names you use on the chart are terrific.
As simple developmental analytical technique is to use a matrix.
there are two axis and for some reason the typewriter dominance got put into PC's rather than the science of time based analysis. So I vote for letting time show as a vertical dimension going down and placing the variables in columns.
Since we are binary there need be only a few null hypothesis columns for each indicator relative to their locations (chosen signal settings) as go/no goes.
Most logic can be done with "AND's, OR's, Inverters and clocks that count either way (the bi-stable multi-vibrator).
Luckily coding has so many different instructions, we can bypass the simple stuff with instructions and just go to the suppression circuitry which so far does not have simple code named instructions.
One note. If you invert the positive output of an AND or an OR, you do NOT get the opposite logic output of the negative out put of an AND or OR. Since we have shown two five legged AND's on the first demo post, this is a consideration for keeping out of induction.