Let's not confuse "currying favor" with extortion.
Last edited:
DeSantis for the win
- Thread starter Tsing Tao
- Start date
And keep in mind that Disney gave to both sides of the aisle but more to Republicans in Florida including DeSantis in recent years.
Yeah, but what has Disney done for DeSantis today? Looks like that's how the guv'nor operates.
I'm willing to bet I've done a hell of a lot more research on it than you, RRY. But happy to enter a conversation on it if you wish.
All depends on what you believe is smut. Me, I think its more about what isn't appropriate for children. You probably disagree and think this is what children should be watching, knowing you.
Disney exec vows more gay characters amid huge inclusivity push
Disney Teases Upcoming “Gayest First Gay Character Yet”
Disney Prez of Entertainment Wants 50 Percent of All Characters Gay or ‘Underrepresented’
So you are going to explain to us how the residents of two counties will be on the hook for well over a billion dollars for the RCID bill. You should — after all — be very aware of this, it has been covered widely in the local press with deep details.
Now that DeSantis signed Disney bill, who assumes all that bond debt?
If it is dissolved, the Reedy Creek district’s debt obligations, revenues and responsibilities would be transferred to Osceola and Orange counties and the small cities of Lake Buena Vista and Bay Lake.
https://www.tampabay.com/news/flori...d-disney-bill-who-assumes-all-that-bond-debt/
Rising cases. The NPC pulling out that ol' card again.
Remember also that - just like every summer - Florida sees higher case load in June/July/August. I explain this to the NPC every year, but he still goes rabid during the summer months with an "everyone is going to die in Florida" craze.
Talk about expressing bias. "Decuntis"? You're on the level with Here4Cuddles now with your debating?
I love that all your articles say things like "If it is dissolved" and "should it go this way" or "Floridians might be..." but nothing has anything definitive. Why is that, do you suppose?
Should they say with certainty what will happen in an event that is a year out in the future? Especially since the bill does not address these matters and will probably cause court cases to be launched from all the parties plus possible additional legislation to address more details.