DeSantis for the win

Lets see how long this goes on before RC changes policy, realizing that they can't fully load a boat with vaccinated passengers and the cost to run the ship is prohibitive.

You want to wager? I mean, you don't exactly have a good track record but today could be your lucky day, GWB.

Seeing that over 50% of the passengers on Royal Caribbean cancelled their cruises and demanded their money back when Royal switched policy to allow unvaccinated people -- which forced Royal to backtrack and state it only applies to Florida. And now Royal is sending information to booked passengers claiming that over 90% of people will be vaccinated on their cruises in an attempt to stop further unbookings. It gets back to giving the customers what they want. And over 80% of cruisers in the U.S. want vaccinated cruises only.

Nobody wants to go on an unvaccinated cruise which turns into the next Diamond Princess.
 
Seeing that over 50% of the passengers on Royal Caribbean cancelled their cruises and demanded their money back when Royal switched policy to allow unvaccinated people -- which forced Royal to backtrack and state it only applies to Florida. And now Royal is sending information to booked passengers claiming that over 90% of people will be vaccinated on their cruises in an attempt to stop further unbookings. It gets back to giving the customers what they want. And over 80% of cruisers in the U.S. want vaccinated cruises only.

Nobody wants to go on an unvaccinated cruise which turns into the next Diamond Princess.

Please show the source of "50% of the passengers on RC canceled their cruises and demanded their money back when RC switched policy to allow unvaccinated people".

I'd like to see evidence of the cancelations and then the cancelations tied to the policy switch (perhaps they checked a box saying that?)
 
Please show the source of "50% of the passengers on RC canceled their cruises and demanded their money back when RC switched policy to allow unvaccinated people".

I'd like to see evidence of the cancelations and then the cancelations tied to the policy switch (perhaps they checked a box saying that?)

As posted earlier according to travel agents --- a large percentage of people on Royal Caribbean cancelled their cruises and demanded their money back from Royal after they changed policy. This taught Royal a harsh lesson regarding what their customers want. This situation has been covered by Cruise Critic and other cruise related forums/new sites.

Seeing that all the cruise lines have developed a work-around to thumb their noses at DeSantis -- his "no COVID passports" policy is laughable.
 
As posted earlier according to travel agents --- a large percentage of people on Royal Caribbean cancelled their cruises and demanded their money back from Royal after they changed policy. This taught Royal a harsh lesson regarding what their customers want. This situation has been covered by Cruise Critic and other cruise related forums/new sites.

Seeing that all the cruise lines have developed a work-around to thumb their noses at DeSantis -- his "no COVID passports" policy is laughable.

Ok, so "50%" now became "large percentage" (which is completely subjective and could be 10% or 90% depending on the person), and the source is now supposedly "travel agents saying so".

But no source anywhere confirming anything you said other than you claiming hearsay. Any time you want to provide actual cancelation data from the cruise line or anything concrete, I'll happily stand corrected. Until then, another GWB Lie ™.
 
Ok, so "50%" now became "large percentage" (which is completely subjective and could be 10% or 90% depending on the person), and the source is now supposedly "travel agents saying so".

But no source anywhere confirming anything you said other than you claiming hearsay. Any time you want to provide actual cancelation data from the cruise line or anything concrete, I'll happily stand corrected. Until then, another GWB Lie ™.

I outlined this in earlier information. Within 48 hours of Royal's policy change 40% of travelers attempted to booked. This rose to 50% after a week. As reported by Travel Agents who do most of the booking for cruises associated with outfits such as cruises.com, etc.

Keep in mind the majority of cruises booked for 2021 are cruises that the cruise lines cancelled in 2020. The non-refundable part of the deposit from passengers had to be applied to another cruise and the cruise lines only offered 2021 bookings to apply the credit to. This means most of the 2021 cruises were already people with previously booked cruises -- this situation also caused the price of 2021 cruises (due to re-booking demand) to go up greatly compared to their original 2020 prices. Of course, this caused many disgruntled passengers because now their original $1100 cruise is costing them $2600 in 2021. The cruise lines were refusing to refund the deposit money -- but at the same time promising their cruises would be "safe". Well with the change in policy on Royal most passengers did not consider their cruises safe -- and found a great avenue to demand their "non-refundable" money back if the cruise line would not ensure safe, vaccinated cruises like the rest of the industry.
 
Last edited:
I outlined this in earlier information. Within 48 hours of Royal's policy change 40% of travelers attempted to booked. This rose to 50% after a week. As reported by Travel Agents who do most of the booking for cruises associated with outfits such as cruises.com, etc.

Who gives a shit if you've outlined this in earlier information. Show the source of data. So far you can't seem to. I wonder why the hell that is?

40% of travelers for what...one cruise? A month's bookings? Where is the data?? where is the source??

Keep in mind the majority of cruises booked for 2021 are cruises that the cruise lines cancelled in 2020. The non-refundable part of the deposit from passengers had to be applied to another cruise and the cruise lines only offered 2021 bookings to apply the credit to. This means most of the 2021 cruises were already people with previously booked cruises -- this situation also caused the price of 2021 cruises (due to re-booking demand) to go up greatly compared to their original 2020 prices. Of course, this caused many disgruntled passengers because now their original $1100 cruise is costing them $2600 in 2021. The cruise lines were refusing to refund the deposit money -- but at the same time promising their cruises would be "safe". Well with the change in policy on Royal most passengers did not consider their cruises safe -- and found a great avenue to demand their "non-refundable" money back if the cruise line would not ensure safe, vaccinated cruises like the rest of the industry.

Sounds like - if true - it was a great way to get their money back by using the excuse of "safety".
 
Who gives a shit if you've outlined this in earlier information. Show the source of data. So far you can't seem to. I wonder why the hell that is?

40% of travelers for what...one cruise? A month's bookings? Where is the data?? where is the source??



Sounds like - if true - it was a great way to get their money back by using the excuse of "safety".

So much DeSantis "winning".

Want a miserable cruise experience? Try to step on a cruise ship unvaccinated. Where you will be treated as a social pariah, not allowed in group settings like the theater, and generally treated like dirt. Just so the message gets across that you are not wanted.


Royal Caribbean plans to keep unvaccinated guests away by making cruises expensive and uncomfortable for them
https://www.orlandoweekly.com/Blogs...-cruises-expensive-and-uncomfortable-for-them

Yes, you can cruise from Florida without a vaccine — if you pay for testing and sail in ‘mask class’
https://www.orlandosentinel.com/opi...0210623-ypt4zazylfgavg7oaihwssgtui-story.html
 
"DeSantis for the win" - Protest Prosecution edition

A Trump supporter could be the first Floridian prosecuted under Ron DeSantis' new anti-protest law
Florida Republicans may soon see their latest stunt backfire in their faces
https://www.salon.com/2021/06/23/a-...uted-under-ron-desantis-new-anti-protest-law/

A Florida man was arrested and charged with multiple felonies last Thursday after intentionally performing a "burnout" with his car over a Pride-themed mural painted on an intersection in Delray Beach, opening him up to become the first person charged under the state's controversial new "anti-riot" bill pushed by Republicans.

Gov. Ron DeSantis, a Republican, signed the bill meant to crack down on protests in the wake of the George Floyd uprisings earlier this year, just as the trial against former Minneapolis police officer Derick Chauvin was wrapping up. The legislation was heavily opposed by first amendment activists and Black lawmakers in the state. Now a young Trump supporter may be the first person entangled by the new law.

Alexander Jerich, 20, is accused of deliberately making skid marks across a mural meant to commemorate the 2016 Pulse Nightclub shooting, in his Chevrolet Silverado. According to WPBF, Delray Beach Police have since charged Jerich with criminal mischief, reckless driving, and evidence of prejudice. Just prior to the incident, Jerich was allegedly participating in a pro-Trump rally in celebration of the former president's birthday that was put together by the Palm Beach County Republican Executive Committee.

A witness told the police that heard someone holler "tear up that gay intersection" before Jerich shortly defaced the mural with his car. The incident was also caught on video, which allowed the police to identify Jerich, who turned himself in, through a license plate search.

Rand Hoch, founder and president of the Palm Beach Human Rights Council, told WFOR that Jerich carried out "a deliberate act of violence against the LGBTQ community. We've made such progress here in the last 30 years on LGBTQ issues. To see someone do something like this took me by surprise."

"Kudos to the Delray Beach Police Department for swiftly identifying and arresting this hateful criminal," Hoch added.

The city had just unveiled the mural two days before the incident, according to law enforcement, and paid north of $16,000 for its creation.

Jerich could now be subject to heightened penalties imposed by Florida's new GOP-backed "anti-riot" law signed back in April. As WPEC's Sam Kerrigan noted: "When it comes to this case, the key here is that this new anti-riot law also stops someone from damaging historic property or a memorial. And under the law, this new Pride mural in Delray Beach, here, qualifies as a memorial because it's dedicated to the lives lost in the Pulse Nightclub shooting in Orlando."

Hoch, too, suggested that Jerich could be charged under the new GOP measure.
 
Back
Top