DeSantis for the win

Nine_Ender said:
Apparently the man sends armed raids on ex-staffers homes he has a personal grudge with. That in itself makes him a complete dirt bag. I guess that's one way to handle data you don't like, send out a small army of dick policemen to harass someone and scare their children. Honestly, fuck him.
More...

Yes, apparently he sends them in to people he has a personal grudge with. Can't be any other reason beyond that for anything done.
 
Tsing Tao said:
Yes, apparently he sends them in to people he has a personal grudge with. Can't be any other reason beyond that for anything done.
More...

Under his watch this all occurred authorized by a judge he just appointed. When asked about the raid, he fully supported it. Face it, he's a dirt bag that shouldn't lead anything. I'm totally ignoring any Covid aspect when I say this.
 
Nine_Ender said:
Under his watch this all occurred authorized by a judge he just appointed. When asked about the raid, he fully supported it. Face it, he's a dirt bag that shouldn't lead anything. I'm totally ignoring any Covid aspect when I say this.
More...

So there couldn't be any other reason for the raid other than "he didn't like the person". That's your position, right?
 
Tsing Tao said:
So there couldn't be any other reason for the raid other than "he didn't like the person". That's your position, right?
More...

He didn't like this person either. Remember not to tell DeSantis what he is pushing is fabricated nonsense.

And whatever you do -- don't dress as the grim reaper and file a case asking DeSantis to close the beaches -- otherwise he will take you to court.

DeSantis backs sanctions against attorney who dressed as Grim Reaper on Florida beaches
https://www.clickorlando.com/news/2...ho-dressed-as-grim-reaper-on-florida-beaches/

People who tell the truth live rent-free in DeSantis' head.
 
b1fdeb53-0a12-4666-a2c3-0ff1ed1b7efe-Cartoon_1214_Monday.jpg
 
gwb-trading said:
He didn't like this person either. Remember not to tell DeSantis what he is pushing is fabricated nonsense.

And whatever you do -- don't dress as the grim reaper and file a case asking DeSantis to close the beaches -- otherwise he will take you to court.

DeSantis backs sanctions against attorney who dressed as Grim Reaper on Florida beaches
https://www.clickorlando.com/news/2...ho-dressed-as-grim-reaper-on-florida-beaches/

People who tell the truth live rent-free in DeSantis' head.
More...

LOL...so some wacko dresses as the Grim Reaper on the beach and files a court case against DeSantis that the court rules is frivolous, and then the court suggests DeSantis can and should sanction this lunatic for wasted time, and DeSantis decides to back that decision, and that's a dictator in action!

What a joke.
 
Tsing Tao said:
For posterity.

I wish I didn't have to do this, but when you're trying to discuss something with someone so disingenuous and always moving the goal posts, you have to make sure everything is spelled out specifically. Otherwise, the weasel does what weasels do. This is a complete list of the whole conversation regarding the 2000/20 days and the supposed 1500/30 days claim. You will also notice how he has stopped defending the 600 per day claim, that one is totally indefensible even for someone as desperate as he. But he'll never admit defeat, just go silent.

What started the conversation on this topic:



Please note the claim. 2000 deaths in 20 days, made on September 28. My initial response to UsualName:



Then, Palooka (GWB) inserts himself into the conversation because he can't help himself. Emphasis on his quote my own.



My Full Response to GWB's quote:



Please note I specifically mention once again the 2000 deaths in 20 days. I do this continually because, as is always the case, GWB will try to weasel out and change the metric as his previous one doesn't work.

GWB again tries to bring the 30 day metric in.



And I agree, we can go back and look - but specifically mention the 2000/20 metric again, because that is the one I am debating (and plan to go back to review). I also mention the possibility the metric will come to fruition. It is, after all, possible.



The professor tells me what we already know.



I let Professor Palooka know that I know this, and again remind him of the metric to check - the 2000/20 conversation, nothing else.



GWB feels as if he has to tell me this is already likely (again) despite his dismal forecasting record. Also, at least he focuses on the 2000/20 metric.



My update on October 5. Please note I also mention I did 21 days, same as when GWB felt he was correcting me yesterday - that's OK. 21 days gives the count an extra day, so should be in GWB's favor.



Professor Palooka's response to this:



Please note how he has said "Yet all the data is not reported for three weeks. " You can bet that if this number isn't hit after three weeks, he will try to move this goalpost as well out from three weeks.

My post from yesterday, updated 10/12.



Now, there might be some confusion for Professor Palooka reading this - and I can understand how he would want to find something - anything at all - to help him in the discussion, so I can see how he would leap to the mention of the 1500 in 30 days there, but the mention was showing how - based on the fact that he claimed 1500 in 30 days was going to happen, this meant that 2000 in 20 days was a forgone conclusion. But unfortunately that isn't what we bet on. We bet on the 2000/20 that has been mentioned all along. In desperation, he lowered the count and raised the day limit so he could get a number that actually might transpire. Sorry, Palooka. We're on to you.


Now, suddenly it's all about the 1500/30 metric.




And my final response. If the first dozen times didn't get through to his idiocy, I don't expect this one to.
More...

Hey GWB. Did we get to 1500 deaths in 30 days from September 28th? We should be far enough where all the deaths are tallied now, right?

Because UsualName's "supposed" news post was total horseshit. You got stomped on that and tried to change the goal post. How did you do?
 
Tsing Tao said:
Hey GWB. Did we get to 1500 deaths in 30 days from September 28th? We should be far enough where all the deaths are tallied now, right?

Because UsualName's "supposed" news post was total horseshit. You got stomped on that and tried to change the goal post. How did you do?
More...

Let's take a look at the updated John Hopkins death by date data for Florida and do some math.
https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/state-timeline/new-deaths/florida/44

My claim was that Florida would experience 1500 or more COVID deaths in the 20 period leading up to September 28th once all the deaths were accounted for and allotted to a day.

9/8 44
9/9 195
9/10 216
9/11 176
9/12 98
9/13 8
9/14 34
9/15 145
9/16 152
9/17 147
9/18 139
9/19 62
9/20 9
9/21 21
9/22 99
9/23 202
9/24 177
9/25 120
9/26 107
9/27 10
9/28 5

20 day total is 2,166 deaths

Yes -- my claim about having over 1500 deaths in 20 days is completely true.

Raw Github data - https://github.com/CSSEGISandData/COVID-19
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top