Can you explain why the politically-altered Florida dashboard shows less daily deaths on a given day than the Florida daily report (1000+ pages each day) provided by the state. Can anyone explain why the daily report shows 55 deaths for a day the Florida dashboard shows 6 deaths. Can someone explain to all of us this absurd discrepancy.
DeSantis for the win
- Thread starter Tsing Tao
- Start date
Can you explain why the politically-altered Florida dashboard shows less daily deaths on a given day than the Florida daily report (1000+ pages each day) provided by the state. Can anyone explain why the daily report shows 55 deaths for a day the Florida dashboard shows 6 deaths. Can someone explain to all of us this absurd discrepancy.
Ah, right. I forgot. When you don't like the numbers, they are altered. You, yourself have used the Florida dashboard as a source before. But now that you don't like the data, time to discredit it and find a source that better tells the fear story. When you do, they are fact-based and supported by "experts". When the estimates provided by these "experts" are wrong, it is because of "adaptive modeling". You always have an excuse. Its tiresome, and no one around here believes any of it anymore.
Explain to me the difference in the deliberately altered COVID data put forward by a politically-driven governor on a state website and the deliberately altered temperature data put forward by a politically-driven climate alarmist professor?
Both are fundamentally wrong.
Please show the proof that the governor is deliberately altering the data? and that your (latest) source should be used (until it shouldn't at some point in the future when you no longer like the data)?
For Georgia we have demonstrated conclusively that published data in the state portal was altered; the intent was to hide the reality of increasing cases by presenting it as a decline in the most recent days. When the Georgia data was presented on May 26th it was showing a decline in cases for the May 12th to 26th period. Now a mere three weeks later the adjusted data shows a rise in cases for the same May 12th to May 26th period. There is no excuse for this in Georgia since case data is reported within 48 hours --- and all the other sources including the AJC website show the correct data in less than 24 hours. The only reason for this manipulation of the state portal information can be deliberate political manipulation.
For Florida the daily compilation report (1000 pages +) shows the correct data but the state portal shows different recent daily data with lower values. There is no excuse for this misalignment between the data. The reason for it can only be deliberate political manipulation -- especially since the fired GIS researcher is now providing her own portal with the correct data.
So let me ask again ----
Explain to me the difference in the deliberately altered COVID data put forward by a politically-driven governor on a state website and the deliberately altered temperature data put forward by a politically-driven climate alarmist professor?
Both are fundamentally wrong.
A direct hit from a 150 plus sustained for 1 hour or so will tear you up kid. Metal Roof and all. Welcome to Hurricane Alley. You will love our state.
Atlantic over Gulf any day any time.Sorry, I don't recall ever talking about Georgia. Please stay on track. Show me proof that the dashboard has been falsified and altered.
It appears that you did not read my entire post. Try reading the second paragraph as well.
The Florida dashboard is obviously falsified because the information does not align with the lengthy daily reports issued by the state. I have outlined the deliberate differences in data previously - this is not human error, the state portal is deliberately manipulated to under-report the information.
I don't read half your posts on Covid anymore. Its the same horseshit over and over again and, as I intoned earlier, it becomes tiresome.
You, yourself, used the dashboard as a source before. Now, because it doesn't show data you like, you call it false, yet you offer no proof that it is false apart from saying "it doesn't align with my (new) source". So you immediately say your new source is right, and your old source is wrong, and not only that - but your old source has to be politically manipulated - without providing a shred of evidence of this. Never mind that both come from State. Never mind that there could be some other reporting issue, or that your new source could be a problem.
This is why I tend to not read all of your Covid nonsense anymore. It is also why most people on this forum don't read it (other than Jem, who is determined to argue with you until the end of time).