That's the French side right?I'm going to St. Martin, end of August.
That's the French side right?I'm going to St. Martin, end of August.
Unless canceled, I will be cruising in October.
The rate of infection may well be lower than reported, and the 50% bump might just be catch ups, but that doesn't change the underlying trend in hospitalizations which is what really matters.
That's the French side right?
It's possible if you don't report the negatives, which is why I said the positivity rate may be higher that reported, should have said IS higher, no doubt.You're still not going to have 104 people test positive if you test 104 random people.
It's possible if you don't report the negatives, which is why I said the positivity rate may be higher that reported, should have said IS higher, no doubt.
Yeah, I meant being reported as higher than the actual.I'm sorry, please explain how the true positive rate would be higher than being reported if you omit the negatives from the reporting.\
If you have 100 people and you report them all positive, then you have a positive test rate of 100%. If you suddenly add 50 negatives to the data, then the positive rate is now 67%. Or do I not understand how this works?
Yeah, I meant being reported as higher than the actual.
Speaking of false, is PhonySnark gone?
I think he's gone.I highly doubt it. Maybe he didn't get his last check for posting and decided to protest?