Quote from Martinghoul:
There would have to be a mechanism to limit their size and prevent excessive concentration, though.
+1Quote from Random.Capital:
I rather suspect that if we had a formal "no bailout" policy - and actually stuck to it - the problem would largely self-regulate. But I'm not sure it's possible without also modifying the Fed's SOP, since they provide a backdoor bailout mechanism.
Anyway, this is likely all rather moot, since as a society we're simply not willing to do this, and I see little indication that is going to change.
+1Quote from Banjo:
Essentially everybody's postulating the same prescription, restructure for accountability and transparency. How to accomplish this incrementally without throwing the world into a Mad Max state of economic chaos
is the conundrum.
Quote from Martinghoul:
Yep, I think that's a viable step... I, personally, would also be very much in favor of some measure of personal liability for directors. IMHO, that's the weakest link in corporate governance. Especially, in light of the Bob Diamond/Barclays shenanigans this week.
I dunno... I am encouraged by the fact that there appears to be a mini shareholder revolt occurring as we speak. Moreover, in the UK they have done something similar w/pension trustees, so there's hope. However, who knows...Quote from pythontrader:
Do you really think that this is an implementable step?
Quote from Martinghoul:
I dunno... I am encouraged by the fact that there appears to be a mini shareholder revolt occurring as we speak. Moreover, in the UK they have done something similar w/pension trustees, so there's hope. However, who knows...