Quote from Trend Following:
It's an interview. Real voices. That's what I do. Why are you afraid?
Good for you. Very good for you.
Pretend you are interviewing Flavia and you have a stopwatch. Soon you will say times up.
But a few questions into the real voices you miss hearing what is written down.
What was written down was that Flavia's clients who use models apparently have told her that models "do not deal with context."
Naturally you move right past this seminal fault Flavia has put on your table.
Covell starts a booklet with John Henry and his 20% and says "x hazardous years" He glides right on past the hazards. The screwed up definition of a trend enters stage left more than halfway through the book.
Back to models and Flavia........
Are model users wrong.....?
Did Flavia get it wrong......?
Did you fuck up one more time with real voices......?
Treating the CW emotions is handled in BF. If these emotions are occurring, then....... Right. We get the solution for improving models.
THE BIG QUESTION?
First I have to correct the question.
The stupid question thought up by you and guys like Covell is:
"Why are you afraid?"
I have to correct four words to respond to a voice that just said: "Why are you afraid?"
My version is:
Q. Why are you ______ and are always in the market all of the time and taking the full offer of the market segment by segment (see yesterday's posted charts)?
A. Because I have a single model that always deals with the changing context and my emotions are continually feelings of support, comfort and confidence. These feelings come from always "knowing that I know" based upon a comprehensive scientific model.