Dems Wrong on Terrorism Again

It was just last week that the regime was claiming the terrorists just needed jobs and the reasons they were terrorist was economic. Now they found out who Jihad John is.

Here is what Obama said.

"What’s true... is that when millions of people -- especially youth -- are impoverished and have no hope for the future, when corruption inflicts daily humiliations on people, when there are no outlets by which people can express their concerns, resentments fester. The risk of instability and extremism grow. Where young people have no education, they are more vulnerable to conspiracy theories and radical ideas, because it's not tested against anything else, they’ve got nothing to weigh. And we've seen this across the Middle East and North Africa.

And terrorist groups are all too happy to step into a void... They try to justify their violence in the name of fighting the injustice of corruption that steals from the people -- even while those terrorist groups end up committing even worse abuses, like kidnapping and human trafficking."


This is who Jihad John is.


"On 26 February 2015, the BBC and The Washington Post identified Jihadi John as Mohammed Emwazi, a 27-year-old Kuwaiti-born British man from a middle-class family who grew up in West London and graduated from the University of Westminster with a computer programming degree"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jihadi_John

This guy was middle class with a college degree in computer programming. Once again Obama's view of the world is divorced from reality.
 
Did the German people of the 30s all "go Nazi" because they all hated Jews, or because the promises of one guy who did hate Jews give them hope they'd get out of their poverty?
 
It's almost impossible to be so consistently wrong about everything like Obama is.
If he bet black on roulette it would come up red 100 times in a row.

The fact that the media still covers for him is disgraceful.
 
Even honest democrats, and there are at least a couple around, will admit privately that his middle eastern policy has been disastrous. He has undermined our one ally, Israel, and destabilized regimes in several countries, leading to failed states and ensuing power vacuums that were filled by terrorist groups like ISIS.

He had a tough hand to play against Iran, admittedly, but seems overly eager for a face-saving deal there.

The scary part is that hillary Clinton could be worse. One of her chief flunkies is Huma Abedin, wife of the disgraced Weiner, and a member of a family with deep muslim brotherhood ties.
 
Did the German people of the 30s all "go Nazi" because they all hated Jews, or because the promises of one guy who did hate Jews give them hope they'd get out of their poverty?

None of the above. It sounds like you are as bad in history as Obama.
 
Even honest democrats, and there are at least a couple around, will admit privately that his middle eastern policy has been disastrous. He has undermined our one ally, Israel, and destabilized regimes in several countries, leading to failed states and ensuing power vacuums that were filled by terrorist groups like ISIS.

He had a tough hand to play against Iran, admittedly, but seems overly eager for a face-saving deal there.

The scary part is that hillary Clinton could be worse. One of her chief flunkies is Huma Abedin, wife of the disgraced Weiner, and a member of a family with deep muslim brotherhood ties.

Well the republicans better point out that Hillary was Sec. of State when the Middle East became completely unraveled. A lot of the foreign policy failures of Obama can be directly tied to Hillary Clinton.
 
Of course they can, but half the republican establishment fell all over themselves congratulating her about what a terrific job she did as Sec. of State. The worst offender perhaps was one Jeb Bush.

Carly Fiorna made a crack about Hillary that someone should tell her that flying all over the world is an activity not an accomplishment.
 
Did the German people of the 30s all "go Nazi" because they all hated Jews, or because the promises of one guy who did hate Jews give them hope they'd get out of their poverty?
That is not the reason Muslims are joining ISIS.

This article looks like is was written before the west knew of the term ISIS and we ignorantly thought it was a civil war in Syria.

Below is a quote from the article:

Bold and underline mine.
"If you think all these mujahideen came from across the world to fight Assad, you're mistaken," said a Sunni Muslim jihadi who uses the name Abu Omar and fights in one of the many anti-Assad Islamist brigades in Aleppo.

"They are all here as promised by the Prophet. This is the war he promised - it is the Grand Battle," he told Reuters, using a word which can also be translated as slaughter.

On the other side, many Shi'ites from Lebanon, Iraq and Iran are drawn to the war because they believe it paves the way for the return of Imam Mahdi - a descendent of the Prophet who vanished 1,000 years ago and who will re-emerge at a time of war to establish global Islamic rule before the end of the world.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/04/01/us-syria-crisis-prophecy-insight-idUSBREA3013420140401

That is why Muslims from around the world are joining ISIS. It has absolutely nothing to do with economics. That is a false narrative the libtards are disseminating.
 
Last edited:
Did the German people of the 30s all "go Nazi" because they all hated Jews, or because the promises of one guy who did hate Jews give them hope they'd get out of their poverty?
Here is another article that clearly explains it for you reading pleasure.

Warning! Reading this article may cause libtards to start convulsing when they realize they are being lied to directly by Oblahblah and libtard media.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/ancient-prophecies-motivate-islamic-state-militants-1416357441
 
Did the German people of the 30s all "go Nazi" because they all hated Jews, or because the promises of one guy who did hate Jews give them hope they'd get out of their poverty?

Didnt it have something to do with goldman sachs?
 
Back
Top