You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Dem's 2nd largest donor now in the slam in the Bahama's awaiting extradition
- Thread starter TreeFrogTrader
- Start date
Not saying it's false, but "facts" that come "straight from SBF's mouth" are something to take with immense skepticism.Let's read the facts -- straight from SBF's mouth. The line above you provided above is for direct, non-dark donations only.
Sam Bankman-Fried says he's the Republicans' third-biggest donor, but used 'dark money' to avoid media criticism
https://www.businessinsider.com/sam...s-the-republicans-third-biggest-donor-2022-11
Sam Bankman-Fried, the founder of FTX, says he's the Republicans' third-biggest donor – but used "dark money" to avoid criticism.
- Sam Bankman-Fried is the second-largest donor to Democrats after George Soros.
- But the FTX founder said he gave just as much to Republicans using "dark money."
- He said he did so to avoid media criticism from "liberal" reporters who would "freak the f*** out."
He revealed the information in a YouTube interview with journalist Tiffany Fong, amid reports that he donated $40 million to the Democrats ahead of the 2022 midterm elections.
That made Bankman-Fried the party's number-two donor, behind only George Soros' $128 million, per OpenSecrets. Bankman-Fried did not specify which Republican causes he pumped "dark money" into.
But the former CEO of the failed crypto exchange has now explained how he donated "about the same amount to both parties this year."
"I've been their third-biggest Republican donor this year as well," he said.
Bankman-Fried explained that this was "not generally known," because "all my Republican donations were dark."
He also referred to the 2010 Citizens United case in the Supreme Court that let corporations and outside groups make unlimited political donations.
This created financing loopholes because these groups did not have to disclose their donors, giving rise to "dark money" that are called "disturbingly common" by the non-partisan Brennan Center for Justice.
Bankman-Fried said he did so to avoid media criticism, rather than for regulatory reasons.
"Reporters freak the f*** out if you donate to a Republican," he said. "They're all secretly liberal and I didn't want to have that fight, so I made all the Republican ones dark."
"Despite Citizens United being the literally the highest-profile Supreme Court case of the decade and the thing everyone talks about with campaign finance, for some reason in practice no-one can possibly fathom the idea that someone actually gave dark."
(More at above url)
Not saying it's false, but "facts" that come "straight from SBF's mouth" are something to take with immense skepticism.
There are at least two dark money organizations that have outlined SBF is a donor of money which was funneled to Republican organizations. So there is some confirmation of these donations. Note that the SBF indictment includes donating to political campaigns in the name of others.