Democrats Iowa Caucus Debacle

Democrats still hard at work counting the Iowa results. 3 days in and they are only at 71%? Utterly, hilarious. The head of the Iowa Democrats claimed on a press conference that they tested the application and it was fine. Explain then, how you found out when it did not work that there was a coding error in the application? If they actually, tested it before the election as they claimed, they would have found out earlier that it did not work and should not even be used?
On a separate report, the guy that owns the software application is supposedly, a close friend of Pete Buttigieg. How did Buttigieg know he was winning? The more reason they should audit the results and see if there is even a paper trail.
 
zxzlwdlyi723.jpg
 
Just saw a Carville clip:

"Why is Tom Perez still Chairman of the DNC? I have no idea?"

"We don't need to become the British Labor Party. Things are not going well over there."

(he names several candidates...then) "I gotta tell ya. Right now I am not very impressed."

"We don't win elections by talking about stuff that is not relevant. We had a great election in 2018 and then the day after we started talking about goofy stuff."

"We can't act like this is going well. So far this is not so good."

"We are talkin' about how to get people to vote from jail cells....and about not having borders...c'mon people."

============

Man, that is first, first class and pithy. Regular viewers know that I will salute anyone and anything that wants to go out on the hunt and kill something and drag it home. I mean someone who wants it down in their guts, not just at the political hack level. Carville is a premier hack too but he has the viscerality to go with it. And yes I just made up a word.


First class interview with him. Awesome. And no it was not the interviewer who made it awesome. Damn that was good. You stupid arse tards should be thankful that you have been given the message you need before the election, even though you are too stupid to follow it.



https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...back_or_we_have_four_more_years_of_trump.html
 
Last edited:
He is the first democrat who has said anything real and intelligent in the last 4 years.
He just put every tard as you call them on this board to shame.
He was particularly insightful about warren.
Had she not chased around bernies leftist tail and established "exoctic" positions... she would have been a formidable candidate.

In my view... that she choose to go that far left... shows she may not be that intelligent.

All she had to do was be better than Biden and less corrupt than Hillary and she was in as the democrat nominee and probably beat Trump.



TreeFrogTrader said:
Just saw a Carville clip:

"Why is Tom Perez still Chairman of the DNC? I have no idea?"

"We don't need to become the British Labor Party. Things are not going well over there."

(he names several candidates...then) "I gotta tell ya. Right now I am not very impressed."

"We don't win elections by talking about stuff that is not relevant. We had a great election in 2018 and then the day after we started talking about goofy stuff."

"We can't act like this is going well. So far this is not so good."

"We are talkin' about how to get people to vote from jail cells....and about not having borders...c'mon people."

============

Man, that is first, first class and pithy. Regular viewers know that I will salute anyone and anything that wants to go out on the hunt and kill something and drag it home. I mean someone who wants it down in their guts, not just at the political hack level. Carville is a premier hack too but he has the viscerality to go with it. And yes I just made up a word.


First class interview with him. Awesome. And no it was not the interviewer who made it awesome. Damn that was good. You stupid arse tards should be thankful that you have been given the message you need before the election, even though you are too stupid to follow it.



https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...back_or_we_have_four_more_years_of_trump.html
More...
 
Democrats are circling the drain now. Their designated man barely got 15% and is going to lose in New England badly as well. South Carolina is harder to predict but Joe will be seriously diminished before then. The party hates Bloomberg so they won't line up behind him even if it could save them.
 
jem said:
He is the first democrat who has said anything real and intelligent in the last 4 years.
He just put every tard as you call them on this board to shame.
He was particularly insightful about warren.
Had she not chased around bernies leftist tail and established "exoctic" positions... she would have been a formidable candidate.

In my view... that she choose to go that far left... shows she may not be that intelligent.

All she had to do was be better than Biden and less corrupt than Hillary and she was in as the democrat nominee and probably beat Trump.
More...


tenor.gif
 
Snarkhund said:
South Carolina is harder to predict but Joe will be seriously diminished before then.
More...

Joe will do very well - will probably get the most votes- in South Carolina.

Except the definition of "very well" is or should be different for Joe there, given the extensive, extensive over the top hype about how SC will be his firewall and that 90% or whatever of blacks will vote for him and he owns every dem plantation person there. Anything less than that undermines his already crumbling narrative that he is the only one who can beat trump and the only one who can get black votes. Everyone knows that the winning nominee needs many black votes but the lefties and the tards here make the case on a regular basis that Joe owns almost all of them and there are none left over for any other candidates. Don't let anyone shiite you, Joe can get more black votes by far in SC and win still get hurt very badly because his shtick is all about being able to display SC as the crown jewel in his strategy.

Watch the tards shift from saying he owns SC and every black in it over to just saying Joe will win in SC as it approaches. If Joe wins but loses a third of the black vote or something like that he is in trouble. Of course, he is in trouble anyway so not much of a risk in saying that.
 
TreeFrogTrader said:
Joe will do very well - will probably get the most votes- in South Carolina.

Except the definition of "very well" is or should be different for Joe there, given the extensive, extensive over the top hype about how SC will be his firewall and that 90% or whatever of blacks will vote for him and he owns every dem plantation person there. Anything less than that undermines his already crumbling narrative that he is the only one who can beat trump and the only one who can get black votes. Everyone knows that the winning nominee needs many black votes but the lefties and the tards here make the case on a regular basis that Joe owns almost all of them and there are none left over for any other candidates. Don't let anyone shiite you, Joe can get more black votes by far in SC and win still get hurt very badly because his shtick is all about being able to display SC as the crown jewel in his strategy.

Watch the tards shift from saying he owns SC and every black in it over to just saying Joe will win in SC as it approaches. If Joe wins but loses a third of the black vote or something like that he is in trouble. Of course, he is in trouble anyway so not much of a risk in saying that.
More...

South Carolina has an open primary meaning you can vote for either Democrat or Republican candidate. Since, Republicans do not have their primary in South Carolina, some Republicans are organizing to all vote for Bernie Sanders. The Republicans in South Carolina can tip the scales if they were to all vote for Bernie Sanders. They hope to elect the weakest Democrat to face President Donald Trump and that would be Bernie Sanders. We also, know the Globalist Wing of the Democrat Party will cut off the money spigot if a Socialist wins the nomination. If Republicans in South Carolina vote for Bernie Sanders, Joe Biden will lose in South Carolina.
 
smallfil said:
South Carolina has an open primary meaning you can vote for either Democrat or Republican candidate. Since, Republicans do not have their primary in South Carolina, some Republicans are organizing to all vote for Bernie Sanders. The Republicans in South Carolina can tip the scales if they were to all vote for Bernie Sanders. They hope to elect the weakest Democrat to face President Donald Trump and that would be Bernie Sanders. We also, know the Globalist Wing of the Democrat Party will cut off the money spigot if a Socialist wins the nomination. If Republicans in South Carolina vote for Bernie Sanders, Joe Biden will lose in South Carolina.
More...

I see.

Interesting dat.

Never thought I would live to see "Republicans for Bernie" bumper stickers, but hey, it's all good.

I don't want to get too far into the weeds but there has been polling that shows that Joe Biden walks on water with blacks who are old enough to be aware of the civil rights era and dem involvement with the cause. But that young blacks tend to have primary affinity with other young people first and their affinity is with Bernie. I dunno. Joe's problem, not mine.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top