Democrats have engineered a disaster!

Quote from pspr:

Obamacare Health Care Exchanges are Democrat Party Front Organizations

I hate to do this to you, but the Investor's Business Daily had an editorial yesterday, and they have discovered the purpose of Obamacare. It has nothing to do with health care. The purpose of Obamacare's got nothing to do with your health, and nothing to do with your insurance.

It's about building a permanent, undefeatable, always-funded Democrat majority. The purpose? To set up a permanent one-party system in this country.


http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2...hanges_are_democrat_party_front_organizations

With the parasite class reaching critical mass under Odumbo, MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!

The only thing missing is the Official Seal.. and that will be acknowledged by Dems ousting Repubs from majorityship in the House come 2014.

:mad: :mad:
 
Quote from Scataphagos:

With the parasite class reaching critical mass under Odumbo, MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!

The only thing missing is the Official Seal.. and that will be acknowledged by Dems ousting Repubs from majorityship in the House come 2014.

:mad: :mad:
I hope that doesn't happen! If it does, we are doomed.
 
Quote from pspr:

<a href=http://ohioconservativereview.com/2013/07/04/obamacare-sticker-shock-part-1-ohio-premiums-expected-to-rise-88/><b>Obamacare Sticker Shock, Part 1: Ohio Premiums Expected to Rise 88%</b></a>

Ohioans should expect their health insurance premiums to rise significantly over the coming years.

This–despite the fact that the “Affordable Care Act” (ACA) was premised on several statements made by White House staff, Congressional leaders, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), and President Obama himself, that the legislation would make premiums more affordable. In fact, they even named the bill “The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.”

How do we know that premiums are going to go up? The latest prediction was made on June 6 by the Ohio Department of Insurance, expecting an 88% increase in Ohioans’ premiums, based on the proposed rates submitted to them by insurance companies who want to do business in Ohio. In August of 2011, one of the world’s leading actuarial companies, Milliman, predicted that the ACA would raise Ohio’s premium costs 55-85%. In March of 2013, the Society of Actuaries predicted that the ACA would raise Ohio’s premium costs 81%, one of the largest expected statewide increases in the country.

So why are experts saying Ohio’s premiums will rise? First, Ohio had relatively low premiums before the ACA. Because of the ACA, Ohio’s costs are now catching up with (and possibly surpassing) the rest of the country–which negates an important competitive advantage Ohio has maintained for years. But more broadly, there are two answers; one is mathematical and the other is philosophical. Below I discuss the math. In future articles in this series, I will discuss the philosophical side and elaborate on my previous discussion on OCR about why the Medicaid Expansion will exacerbate Ohioans’ upcoming premium increases. [Read on OCR: “Cherry-Picking Obamacare.”]

* In this article, I will define “healthy people” as those whose health insurance premium payments exceed their insurance claims. “Unhealthy people” are those who claims exceed their premiums.

Why the Math Is Increasing Premiums

First is a concept called adverse selection. Healthy people are finding ways out of the pool of premium payers, while unhealthy people are working their way into the pool of beneficiaries. The ACA’s risk pool requirements compel the healthy to subsidize the unhealthy. This was supposed to become “affordable” by imposing the individual mandate nationwide, spreading the costs out among the new, mainly healthy, entrants into the pool. It does not appear to be adding up that way at this point.

Meanwhile, under several ACA mandates, the unhealthy have access to more coverage. Again, this simply costs more money, any way you look at it. Keep in mind the supply and demand aspects of additional coverage: the ACA will greatly increase the demand for coverage, while the supply of medical services is likely to remain stagnant or decrease. Doctor and nurse shortages are already common throughout the country, particularly in Ohio. Basic economics advises that this will further drive costs up.

But what about out-of-pocket costs for the beneficiaries of the ACA? The ACA’s subsidies and community ratings were supposed to keep out-of-pocket costs down for the unhealthy. The merits of that supposition have been substantively challenged as well. First, the Obama administration has openly acknowledged that subsidies themselves—the ACA is heavily laden with them—drive up costs by eliminating the incentive to economize. It is entirely likely that more subsidies will merely drive up prices more—requiring even more subsidies. Many respected commentators believe this is not only a problem, but the primary problem with American health insurance today. If this is a problem, the ACA greatly exacerbates it.
 
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/07/17/obamacare-is-the-rights-worst-nightmare/

Obamacare Is the Right’s Worst Nightmare

"News from New York: it looks as if insurance premiums on the individual market are going to plunge thanks to Obamacare. This shouldn’t come as a surprise; in fact, the New York experience perfectly illustrates why Obamacare had to look the way it does. And it also illustrates why conservatives should be terrified about this legislation, as it takes effect. Americans may have had a lot of misgivings in advance, thanks to vast, deliberately spread misinformation. But I agree with Matt Yglesias — unless the GOP finds even more ways to sabotage the plan, this thing is going to work, it’s going to be extremely popular, and it’s going to wreak havoc with conservative ideology.

"To understand what’s happening in New York, you have to start with what almost everyone at least pretends to believe: Americans shouldn’t find it impossible to get health insurance because of pre-existing conditions that aren’t their fault. Two decades ago, New York tried to deal with this by imposing community rating: insurance is available to everyone, and the price doesn’t depend on your medical history.

"The problem was that this created a death spiral: young, healthy people didn’t buy insurance, worsening the risk pool, driving up premiums, driving out more relatively healthy people, etc., until you were left with a rump of very ill people paying very high rates.

"How do you deal with this? Well, ideally, Medicare for all. But since that wasn’t going to happen, you improve the risk pool by requiring everyone to buy insurance — the individual mandate. And since some people won’t be able to afford that, you also offer subsidies. Voila! ObamaRomneycare!

"Where does the money for the subsidies come from? Partly by reducing corporate welfare: reducing overpayments for Medicare Advantage, reducing tax breaks for very generous insurance plans; partly with new taxes on the wealthy.

"And while a few people will be hurt — young, healthy individuals too affluent to qualify for subsidies, wealthy taxpayers, etc. — a much larger number of people will be helped, some of them enormously.

"Does this amount to “redistribution”? Well, yes — not as an end in itself, but yes, a lot of people will be made better off at the expense of an affluent few.

"And Yglesias is right: there will be bobbles along the way, but this is going to become an immensely popular program. By the time Liz Cheney challenges Hillary Clinton’s reelection campaign, there will be signs at the rallies declaring “Don’t let the government get its hands on Obamacare!”

"Conservatives are right to be hysterical about this: it’s an attack on everything they believe — and it’s going to make Americans’ lives better. What could be worse?"
 
Quote from Lucrum:

Because we're paying for it, dumb ass?

On cue, Ricter does his daily "cut and paste" of Krugman's latest brain droppings.

As if we didn't already know it, Ricter basically admitted he spends the other half of his day fawning over whatever runs thru Krugman's demented mind.
 
Quote from denner:

On cue, Ricter does his daily "cut and paste" of Krugman's latest brain droppings.

As if we didn't already know it, Ricter basically admitted he spends the other half of his day fawning over whatever runs thru Krugman's demented mind.
I think rectum sends letters and emails to Krugman, asking to suck his dick.
 
Quote from all the racist libtards:

That article is racist! And so are all of you! And so is everyone in Ohio, all racists! And so is anyone who ever heard of Ohio, all racists! And everyone who agrees with this article all racists and so is all your family and friends and everyone who ever met you! Racists, the lot of you!
 
Back
Top