Democrats’ Armageddon Option

[exGOPer]

You can lead a stupid fucking libtard horse to water but you can’t make him drink.
You have zero understanding of what’s going on here.
Zero.
Go back to sleep Leftard

You didn't lead me to anything, you peddle a theory you can't back up.

I asked you for a SPECIFIC instance of spying, you haven't provided anything.

4 years of the same bullshit and not a single guys you mentioned are indicted but ya, let's believe bullshit from the same guy who thinks Trump was going to build a wall.

 

[LacesOut]

You didn't lead me to anything, you peddle a theory you can't back up.

I asked you for a SPECIFIC instance of spying, you haven't provided anything.

4 years of the same bullshit and not a single guys you mentioned are indicted but ya, let's believe bullshit from the same guy who thinks Trump was going to build a wall.

Are you retarded?
Don't answer...rhetorical question...

Obama Admin targeted the Trump campaign based on KNOWINGLY falsified information.

"The FBI used Trump adviser Carter Page as the basis for the original FISA application, due to his contacts with Russians. After that surveillance was approved, however, federal officials discredited the collusion allegations and noted that Page was a CIA asset. Clinesmith had allegedly changed the information to state that Page was not working for the CIA."

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-h...y-the-media-on-spying-by-obama-administration

 

[kmgilroy89]

I doubt Democrats do much of anything. Bringing more judges on, because you don't like the court's makeup is terrible precedent. There should be a constitutional amendment setting the maximum number. Otherwise you could have a party stack it with 20 partisan judges if they wanted to do so.

 

[exGOPer]

Are you retarded?
Don't answer...rhetorical question...

Obama Admin targeted the Trump campaign based on KNOWINGLY falsified information.

"The FBI used Trump adviser Carter Page as the basis for the original FISA application, due to his contacts with Russians. After that surveillance was approved, however, federal officials discredited the collusion allegations and noted that Page was a CIA asset. Clinesmith had allegedly changed the information to state that Page was not working for the CIA."

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-h...y-the-media-on-spying-by-obama-administration

Your article says 'OPINION'

So the real question is, on a scale of 1 to 10, how retarded are you?

Giving me an op-ed piece when I asked you for specific facts - like an indictment.

 

[exGOPer]

I doubt Democrats do much of anything. Bringing more judges on, because you don't like the court's makeup is terrible precedent. There should be a constitutional amendment setting the maximum number. Otherwise you could have a party stack it with 20 partisan judges if they wanted to do so.

So Democrats should just lay low and accept what Cons push through because of a future precedent? Cons don't care for precedent or rule of law anymore, there is no need to expect anything fair.

 

[kmgilroy89]

So Democrats should just lay low and accept what Cons push through because of a future precedent? Cons don't care for precedent or rule of law anymore, there is no need to expect anything fair anymore.

You realize that when power shifts they will reverse everything? They could have ended the filibuster for everything themselves when they had complete power, but didn't. Cooler heads need to make concrete rules about how to proceed with future SCOTUS vacancies and there should be a constitutional amendment regarding those rules for future appointees. What we have right now is majority rule is needed to fill any SCOTUS nominee. It probably will be that way for the foreseeable future.

 

[exGOPer]

You realize that when power shifts they will reverse everything? They could have ended the filibuster for everything themselves when they had complete power, but didn't. Cooler heads need to make concrete rules about how to proceed with future SCOTUS vacancies and there should be a constitutional amendment regarding those rules for future appointees. What we have right now is majority rule is needed to fill any SCOTUS nominee. It probably will be that way for the foreseeable future.

Yes they will but if things are not changed now then there is no relevancy to having power at all. And they did end the filibuster for SC judges. Court packing is an absolute necessity or no majority powered legislation is safe.

 

[kmgilroy89]

Yes they will but if things are not changed now then there is no relevancy to having power at all. And they did end the filibuster for SC judges. Court packing is an absolute necessity or no majority powered legislation is safe.

Democrats ended the filibuster for other judges. It's been tit for tat for a while. Right now there would be few appointees in divided government for any positions with the partisan climate we are in.

 

[LacesOut]

Your article says 'OPINION'

So the real question is, on a scale of 1 to 10, how retarded are you?

Giving me an op-ed piece when I asked you for specific facts - like an indictment.

Are you dense?
1) The FBI used Trump adviser Carter Page as the basis for the original FISA application, due to his contacts with Russians.
FACT

2) After that surveillance was approved, however, federal officials discredited the collusion allegations and noted that Page was a CIA asset.
FACT

3) Clinesmith had allegedly changed the information to state that Page was not working for the CIA.
NOT ALLEGED - FACT

Turley is entitled to his opinions. But these are facts. Clinesmith has been indicted. More should come.
Hold onto your Libtard vagina.

 

[exGOPer]

Are you dense?
1) The FBI used Trump adviser Carter Page as the basis for the original FISA application, due to his contacts with Russians.
FACT

Ok, but Carter Page was not part of Trump campaign when the warrant was issued. Now you say two hops were used to spy but haven't shown absolutely any evidence that there was spying, what was picked up from this spying? Who got caught in the net?

2) After that surveillance was approved, however, federal officials discredited the collusion allegations and noted that Page was a CIA asset.
FACT

Ok, see above

3) Clinesmith had allegedly changed the information to state that Page was not working for the CIA.
NOT ALLEGED - FACT

Ok, relevant to Trump campaign how?

Turley is entitled to his opinions. But these are facts. Clinesmith has been indicted. More should come.
Hold onto your Libtard vagina.

More will come fucking when? Four years and this is all you got, one FISA abuse among thousands that has happened since Republicans changed rules on them after 9/11. Give me a fucking break about crying about FISA abuse.