Quote from exGOPer:
Yea, a 0.2% reduction in spending clearly fixed that.
But you still haven't answered my question - name these pre-1997 policies and their impact on the economy.
Here comes the retard with another set of disingenuous data
Why the fuck would you include 97 in there when the GOP policies fully went into effect only in 98?
And here comes the strawman, the biggest tool in the wingnut toolbox. When did I ever talk about a 'flawless' model???
Quote from exGOPer:
Thanks for stating the obvious which is why I have carefully repeated the word FULLY many times while you are counting the ENTIRE 1997 in your bullshit GDP analysis.
Now go on, peddle some more disingenuous bullshit.
Quote from Mav88:
forcing more spending cuts than otherwise would have occurred
Quote from Mav88:
well dumbass, as I pointed out earlier I could take it out but that makes your argument weaker. They started fall 1997.. [/B]
Quote from Mav88:
you said that you could asses with certainty the effects of tax cuts on GDP, the only way to do that is with a flawless model. Even moderately sophisticated people know that, therefore you are a low understanding simpleton parroting some lefty material. [/B]
Quote from RCG Trader:
Katy Perry makes good music. I was surfing the radio on a trip back from KC, and I heard the song, Wike Awake. I thought to myself, that young lady has some talent. Then I found out who it was. She is good.