Donnap's example was a 3 years call vol=5% in a BSM world 


Quote from tradingjournals:
Donnap was the first to give the data, and to learn from the solution, so she deserves to know it, as she has earned it.
I think Donnap is doing the right thing to keep it from public, unless the trick is well known elsewhere, which I have not seen. If no one before me has come up with it, I believe I have intellectual rights on it.
Quote from sambian:
I don't know who came up with the idea that "delta" represents probability of ending in the money, but it's not true.
Quote from saminny:
I just didnt bother to think about it... but its simple i got it.
-----
You're great ...Quote from tradingjournals:
Did you have the idea to think about the question in the first place? How sure are you that your set of the "unknowns unknowns" is not empty? What if your set of "unknowns unknowns" is a subset of "knowns knowns" in the hand of your opposition in the option's market?
My set of "unknowns unknowns" is definitely not empty, and even if it were empty, I would be stupid to assume it is empty unless I can prove otherwise---which I find is an impossible task.
I find it more difficult to pose an unknown question than to answer a known question. For me, posing a question is 99% (or a large number) of the answer.

Quote from tradingjournals:
Did you have the idea to think about the question in the first place? How sure are you that your set of the "unknowns unknowns" is not empty? What if your set of "unknowns unknowns" is a subset of "knowns knowns" in the hand of your opposition in the option's market?
My set of "unknowns unknowns" is definitely not empty, and even if it were empty, I would be stupid to assume it is empty unless I can prove otherwise---which I find is an impossible task.
I find it more difficult to pose an unknown question than to answer a known question. For me, posing a question is 99% (or a large number) of the answer.