Quote from Martinghoul:
There's no need to be rude...
When you say it's "what the option did in relation to the underlying", what horizon are you referring to (with respect to the time used to calculate the B-S delta)? Is that "what the option did in relation to the underlying" during the next hour, the rest of the trading day or the rest of the year? How do you know that during this period the price of the option wasn't affected by a change in something other than the price of the underlying? Would you not agree that, if something else could affect the price of the option during your sampling period, your comparison between "true delta" and B-S delta makes no sense, given the definition of B-S delta
Again you fail to comprehend. I have stated and the chart shows the BSM delta vs. the True delta on a daily basis.
And yes the price of the option WAS effected by change in something other than the price of the underlying. Of course I would agree that something else could affect the price of the option during the sample period. That's the whole point. It makes perfect sense, the comparison with the BSM model Delta and the true delta showing wide discrepancies was the purpose of the analysis. And since you state that "something other" & "something else" affects the price of the option in relationship to the underlying then you would have to agree that utilizing the Greeks based on a "Theoretical Model" for trading decisions is hazardous at best. That has been my assertion from the start.
