Delta Analysis

Quote from stoic:

Why yes I have. So your point IS???

Your premise is faulty at best. You've shown a lack of understanding of the greeks - as have many others on this thread.

You just responded to the two correct answers on the thread. Think about it.

Do you really wish to be enlightened? It's not that hard to get it.
 
Quote from stoic:
So enlighten me.....

However, since I've traded options professionally for 30 years, and currently work as a Business Systems Analyst in the brokerage industry as a SME to support software development in margin, CPM, and complex options handling, I won't accept an explanation overflowing with key buzzwords and a plethora option jargon. I want facts and figures. Details in real time. Formulas and values.
Sure thing...

By "apples and oranges" I meant that you're comparing an instantaneous quantity (analytical delta) that's based on a particular value of a parameter to a realized change in the price of an option over a particular period, during which the value of that all-important parameter may have changed. Is that sufficiently jargon-free for you?

As to the point of BSM, there's an excellent analogy that aaron offered in a thread here: http://www.wilmott.com/messageview.cfm?catid=8&threadid=79606
 
Quote from Martinghoul:

Sure thing...

Is that sufficiently jargon-free for you?

Sufficient in the lack of gratuitous jargom.

Severely lacking in any substance. (as expected)
 
Quote from stoic:
Sufficient in the lack of gratuitous jargom.

Severely lacking in any substance. (as expected)
Well, it's now your turn to enlighten me... What, in your view, constitutes "substance" and which part of my response was lacking in it?
 
Quote from stoic:

Sufficient in the lack of gratuitous jargom.

Severely lacking in any substance. (as expected)

i've learned some hidden rules on et from jh and hypo. one doesn't have to post somthing useful to be meaningful.
 
Quote from donnap:

Your premise is faulty at best. You've shown a lack of understanding of the greeks - as have many others on this thread.

You just responded to the two correct answers on the thread. Think about it.

Do you really wish to be enlightened? It's not that hard to get it.

I've provided charts with details of the calculated delta vs. true deltas based on real time data done on a daily basis calculated with an independent price model.

Lots of challenges with no corroboration.

so if it's faulty....show me...
 
Quote from stoic:

I've provided charts with details of the calculated delta vs. true deltas based on real time data done on a daily basis calculated with an independent price model.

Lots of challenges with no corroboration.

so if it's faulty....show me...

I've seen too many different types of deltas (or sensitivities) related to options. It all depends on the definition of individual delta.

The convntional delta is mainly/merely a hedge ratio, for the practical and important purpose of hedging its UL, simply due to Hedging is the original purpose of options.

You need to specify the definition of your preferred delta (whatever it is called) for further discussion. A chart by itself is not enough, to avoid any misleading.
 
McMillan:

"The first risk measurement that concerns the option strategist is how much current exposure his option position has as the undrlying security moves. This is called "delta".

In fact, the term delta is commonly used in at least two different contexts: to express the amount by which an option changes for 1-point move in the underlying security, or to describe the equivalent stock position of an entire option portfolio."
 
Also delta is the probability that the underlying will finish on the strike price at expiration.


50 delta =50% probability
 
Back
Top