What is funny is you all are arguing which one is better when both those cards most likely share the same GPU.
i don't know how it is done now but but it is still probably the same still , the same line(all 8000 or all 6000 etc) of cards share the same GPU architecture(like what Intel does) what really differentiates them is the core clock speed(and memory speed) ,included cache memory, and what the software drivers enabled for the cards.
The Quadro line shared the same GPU's as the FX cards also. what use to mainly differentiate them was that the cards usually came with significant more memory, ran slower for stability, and the softwre drivers enabled more fetures for CAD use. Some people use to run the Quadro drivers on fx cards to basically turn that card into a quadro. simple as that.
see here to compare.
http://www.nvidia.com/object/IO_14605.html
http://www.nvidia.com/page/geforce8.html
they look the same to me. i would probably get the 8300 since its alot cheaper.
i don't know how it is done now but but it is still probably the same still , the same line(all 8000 or all 6000 etc) of cards share the same GPU architecture(like what Intel does) what really differentiates them is the core clock speed(and memory speed) ,included cache memory, and what the software drivers enabled for the cards.
The Quadro line shared the same GPU's as the FX cards also. what use to mainly differentiate them was that the cards usually came with significant more memory, ran slower for stability, and the softwre drivers enabled more fetures for CAD use. Some people use to run the Quadro drivers on fx cards to basically turn that card into a quadro. simple as that.
see here to compare.
http://www.nvidia.com/object/IO_14605.html
http://www.nvidia.com/page/geforce8.html
they look the same to me. i would probably get the 8300 since its alot cheaper.