Fractal .... a bit off topic...what supplements do you buy? I'm a bit of junkie myself...
Quote from zdreg:
"Why is it you insist on testing peoples knowledge when you know full well they're right? That condescending attitude is an insult, and one deserves another, yea?" from achilles
i disagree with him much of the time but the fact is he can think outside of the box, which is appreciated considering the nonsense and unsubstantiated opinions which pollute ET.
use his condescending attitude, as a motivating factor to make your posts more substantial and to the point.
Quote from achilles28:
It's called leverage, dummy. 2008 ring a bell?
Every boom has been followed by a corrective bust since time began. Yet we made it all the way here, some 25,000 years later....in spite of this dreaded deflation, you speak of. How do you explain that, exactly? Shouldn't we all have died out in some mass deflationary extinction 5000 years ago? When humans refused to exchange clay tokens for bronze pots, in the expectation of even lower future prices, and suddenly, we all had no pots or food, then we died?!?! Isn't that how that fairy tale works?!??
Btw, prices are sticky, wages aren't. That's why living standards *decline* with high inflation. But you already knew that? You just work for a bank, or an investment bank, so you're talking your own book. Nothing new.
Right, pls take my word for it that I am not testing your knowledge and I am not being condescending. Like I have said many times here and elsewhere, I argue with people, because most of the time, even when I disagree, I end up learning something. I am asking questions because I want to understand the other person's logic and also subject my own line of reasoning to some stress testing.Quote from achilles28:
Why is it you insist on testing peoples knowledge when you know full well they're right? That condescending attitude is an insult, and one deserves another, yea? We both know full well capital requirements are impacted negatively by declining book values of paper assets (deflation), which is magnified by leverage. So instead of playing dumb, which is dumb in itself and counterproductive to a productive discussion, lets just get on with it?
I am happy to answer your question and I thought I was answering them. In my opinion, 2008 happened because of the accumulation of leverage at all levels of the financial system. The amount of leverage was so egregious that the system became extremely fragile and unstable. No, in my opinion, deflation in itself was not a major threat to the banking system. Deflation was only a symptom and a result of bigger underlying systemic issues that surfaced during the crisis.Why don't you answer any of my questions, btw? I asked you a few, yet you want only yours addressed? Why did 2008 happen? Was deflation not a major threat to the banking system? How did humanity not only survive, but thrive in spite of the hundreds, if not thousands, of deflations that have occurred over thousands of years of civilization? Shouldn't we all be dead by now, according to you, Krugman and other deflation scare mongers?
Yeah, you're right, we get cheaper products, over time. But isn't it true that populations grow over time? So let me echo your statement: inflation IS NATURAL and is a consequence of population growth.I really have to question your knowledge at this point, because it seems to me you lack some basic understanding of economics. Technological and productive improvements allow the creation of cheaper products, over time. Given a static currency value, prices deflate over time. Not inflate. That's how the system is supposed to work. Deflation IS NATURAL and a consequence of technological progress. So to say it's bad, is really silly and dumb.
First of all, the fall in the prices of a specific asset class isn't how I define deflation. Secondly, I would never say that it's a bad thing. I agree with you that it's very much a necessary process of normalization.To wit, the context to which your implying (I hope), is that deflation is bad after a bubble - ie after a huge run up in some asset class. IOW, the popping of a bubble is bad. Not progressive technological improvement. Again, your wrong.
Well, given the support that the Japanese population has thrown behind Abe, I'd say that they disagree with you about deflation. There's a few other indicators that deflation for Japan was a far from a "normal thing". Moreover, let's look at the real estate prices in Japan, like you suggest.Take Japan. Their deflation is not a bad thing. It's a normal thing. Their stock market tripled. And real estate prices quadrupled. Prices have to return to original levels before growth can begin anew. That's how it works. That's how it's always worked. Artificially inflating the FIRE sector at the expense of the rest of the economy does nothing but decrease living standards for the whole, while shielding a politically protected class from insolvency of their own doing. Do you not admit that? Or is it "normal" to print Zim notes by the trillion, explode the stock market 10,000%, and then sustain that level, because.....well, a return to original values would hurt the rich? Of course, the middle and lower class get eviscerated, since they dont own any assets. But who cares, right?
What exactly is your argument?
Quote from achilles28:
Fractal .... a bit off topic...what supplements do you buy? I'm a bit of junkie myself...
Quote from Martinghoul:
We're capitalists here, right, not socialists? If I have managed to become wealthy and powerful through my own efforts, I will use my influence to promote policies that favor me and my interests, such as lower or no taxes, less regulation, less government intervention, etc. Obviously, if, like you say, I benefit from inflation, I am gonna push for that as well. Why should I, as a self-interested capitalist, care about middle and lower classes?
Wait a sec, are you giving me the whole Obama "you didn't build it" line here?Quote from FireWalker:
Unfortunately, the only way to become "wealthy and powerful" today is through supporting government of more regulation. It is insertion of authority where none belongs. That's the only way to get rich today.
The technologists that make it big are either crooks, or naive and allow a 3rd party/government its intervention.
In short, we are ruled by crooks who side with the government to make their wealth. As evidenced by the power of government growing ever larger.
Quote from Martinghoul:
Wait a sec, are you giving me the whole Obama "you didn't build it" line here?