The difference between the 70's and current cirucumstances is the absence of wage inflation. Without the wage inflation, a wage-price spiral cannot occur.
Debt expansion has been tried and flamed out. Nobody is creditworthy enough to take on additional debt; those that are are sensible enough to understand forces are not status quo and ROI will probably not cover debt costs(at current). So they don't borrow.
If monetary stimulus does not enter the economy it remains only an accounting entry. Ergo, money velocity stays flat or falls. You can have an overabundance of food, but if it rots on the trees, it makes no difference to the starving.
Without wage inflation, no generalized inflation beyond a certain point. Consumption will just be curtailed, and that is disinflationary. You can't have your cake and eat it too.
Debt expansion has been tried and flamed out. Nobody is creditworthy enough to take on additional debt; those that are are sensible enough to understand forces are not status quo and ROI will probably not cover debt costs(at current). So they don't borrow.
If monetary stimulus does not enter the economy it remains only an accounting entry. Ergo, money velocity stays flat or falls. You can have an overabundance of food, but if it rots on the trees, it makes no difference to the starving.
Without wage inflation, no generalized inflation beyond a certain point. Consumption will just be curtailed, and that is disinflationary. You can't have your cake and eat it too.