Quote from jasmine1:
A proprietary trader trades with the firm's capital and gets a percentage of his or her profits. The firm takes ALL the risk and a good percentage of the profits as well as commissions and fees. If a firm claims to be a proprietary firm, their trader's do not put up a "token amount of risk capital"
Over the last few years many trading arcades have tried to re-define the definition of proprietary traders to help them reduce risk and keep their business models alive.
Quote from ken__0:
hey don, which one of the strategys you mention above do you find yourself and your traders utilizing the most
Agree, so let's please stay on topic. If ken__0 or anyone else has a question for Don best to ask it on one of the many Bright threads, send him a PM, or give him a call. Thanks.Quote from jasmine1:
The thread poster is asking for a definition of a proprietary firm not a definition of Mr. Bright's firm. That is what I provided him in my previous post.
Quote from Don Bright:
We engage in the stock exchange, floor trading, business model...the same thing we did from the "other side" going back to the 1970's. Nothing new or different, just designed for those who want to run their own business vs. having a job. Keeping 100% of one's trading profits is a nice lure, especially when you have so little at risk.
We found out a long time ago that traders tend to do much (much) better when they have some money at risk.
Trader/employee types have to make a lot of $$ for the firm before they can keep anything (in most cases), and the poorer traders won't be around long. Firms don't really need to pay someone to risk their capital any longer...technology has pretty much seen to that. What we see is the entrepreneur having the best chance for continuing success with full profit potential.
As they say "different strokes"....all the best,
Don