Quote from Teleologist:
you claim there is no evidence for ID even though you are clueless as to what evidence for ID would look like.
Actually I mentioned what I thought evidence for ID would look like - goats with 14 eyes coming down from the heavens and angels and fire and brimstone.
No? You don't like that? You think it's facetious? I am dead serious. So if that isn't the only possible thing that could constitute evidence for ID, why don't you tell us what would constitute evidence. Please remember, if you propound a theory, you cannot use your opponent's disinclination to provide examples of what would be evidence of that theory as proof that the theory is valid. As an example, I have a theory that the Moon was made by Space Aliens.
You don't like my theory? Then why don't you tell me what evidence for my theory would look like. After all, if you can't even say what evidence of the theory would look like, how can you question it??????
What's that? It's an absurd question, since you are not the one that propounded this crackpot theory in the first place? I don't care!! Your criticism of my theory is invalid if you cannot tell me what
evidence of my theory would look like.
What's that? You cannot say what evidence of my theory would look like? What about an Alien artifact?
But you see, Zeleologist/pilier.... I could claim that
that is not the only evidence that could prove my theory!!! You see? You could say 'There are no Alien artifacts on the moon'. I would say... Oh No? What about the Sea of Tranquility?
IN MY OPINION that is evidence!!! There are no goats with 17 eyes coming down from heaven but that is not the only evidence that ID could be true, isn't that correct??
See? It is
obvious to you that nature exhibits design. But that is nothing more than
your opinion!!! There is and can never be any
proof for it. It is obvious to me that the Sea of Tranquility is an Alien artifact. There is no way for us to prove or disprove it. If you say it was a meteor hit, I say it was a spaceship landing site.
It is not our responsibility to tell you what evidence for your crackpot theories would look like. Nor are criticisms of your supposed theories invalid if the critic does not have the same delusions as you.
It is your responsibility to live up to your word and provide
the proof you claimed you had for ID.
You will never do it - you will continue to evade the main point by demanding that your critics jump through dialectical hoops. You will also post utter garbage like this
Quote from Zeleologist-pilier:
How do you measure design?
One way would be to first measure âchanceâ then take the reciprocal to get the design metric.
In short you will do anything other than admit that your belief is purely faith-based and that, contrary to your claims, it is not scientific or supported by data in any way, and that ID is not a research project, but a propaganda campaign mounted by radical Christians to impose their faith-based world view on a majority which has no interest in it.
Okay?
Okay! I'm glad we got that straightened out.
