Quote from fundjunkie:
No, you could use anything that can handle intra-day and eod data. that said, I generally encourage people to avoid Tradestation when they have a choice. It has too many limitations. If you browse this and other threads those limitations will become readily apparent. But hey, it might be right up your street.
By auto-execution I mean unattended triggering of position entries and closures. Part of the attraction of eod trading is you can do that manually. You couldn't do that in a "once during the day" model cos you wouldn't know when the entry might get triggered.
Not from me, I've not done any backtesting for quite a while. I'm in research mode and writing code. I use Tradersstudio and Murray ruggiero is often around here and should be able to address your query directly. he would be able to explain the "virtual backtester" too which would help with what I "think" you'd like to do. I don't want to explain it because although I'm aware of it I have not used it.
For your information, I believe a virtual backtester would help where you have a conventional eod system but oerlay a metastrategy that uses intra-day data. So there are three variations I've touched upon:
1) EOD
2) Once during the day (EOD style system with intra-day entry/exit)
2) EOD with intra-day meta-strategy overlay.
Be aware that when I talk about intra-day execution I don't mean day trading but rather the capability to signal entries and exits intra-day with a system who's holding period might average one or two weeks. However, what i added to that is that ideally one would have systems traded in harmony modelling different market regimes and timeframes (including day trading systems) in order to find an overall more robust approach.
Thx
D
Thanks fundjunkie, that was interesting. Shall ask Murray for the same.
Read about back-testing, it looks that it is a kind of "Technical Analysis". But, so many people are against TA.
Please explain. Thanks!

Murray ruggiero, please give examples of back-testing. Thanks!
