Quote from cdcaveman:
i have found in many cases putting on credit spreads instead of just outright cash secured puts has reduced my credit related to my cash secured amount but enabled me to have the desicion later if the stock gets cut in have to not have to take the stock at such a loss
Investors who are pure technical traders, who do not really know much about a companies fundamentals (cash flow statement, balance sheet, income statements, ratio comparisions for debt levels, margins,ect...) should absolutely do credit spreads instead of naked or cash secured puts.
The reason being, if you don't know how solid a company is, you have no idea of its ability to "recover" after a drop.
And all companies are potentially at risk of a drop at any time, and for any of many reasons.
The only problem i have with credit spreads is, too many investors treat all 1 points spreads as equals. Same with all 2, 3, 4, and 5 point spreads.
Since the margin requirement is the same for a $85/$80 spread, as it is for a 25/20 spread, someone with $12,000 to invest in that 5 point spread, must come up with $204,000 if he wishes to consider buying that $85 quality stock brought down temporarily by a bad market.
Since he obviously can't, he has no choice, but to close the trade for a loss.... partial or total.
I don't like the idea of not being able to ride out "temporary" down turns in a volatile market, if I feel I have a reasonably priced, good quality stock, whose contract expiration date just happens to line up poorly with a a bad week in the market.
HOWEVER, the only thing worse than that, is going naked on a stock you really know nothing about fundamentally, and bought solely as a trend or technical trade.
Those type traders should absolutely be investing with protection.