Debate commission: Trump had audio 'issues'

Debate commission: Trump had audio 'issues'
http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/30/politics/debate-commission-trump-had-audio-issues/index.html?adkey=bn

The Commission on Presidential Debates revealed in a one-sentence statement Friday that Donald Trump's audio was impacted earlier in the week.

"Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," the commission said in a statement. No other details were immediately made available.

The statement provided no evidence that the audio issue affected the television audience of more than 80 million people.

Trump complained earlier in the week that his microphone wasn't functioning properly at Monday's debate.

"And they also had, gave me a defective mic. Did you notice that? My mic was defective within the room," he told a group of reporters afterward. "No, but I wonder, was that on purpose? Was that on purpose? But I had a mic that wasn't worked properly, with, working properly within the room."

Friday's statement, however, said nothing about a microphone problem.

Trump's Democratic challenger, Hillary Clinton, mocked Trump the day after the debate for complaining about his mic.

"Anybody who complains about the microphone is not having a good night," Clinton told reporters.
 
So that explains why he snorts cocaine?

Do you have any realistic evidence to back up your assertion? This after all is someone who doesn't even drink.

It is more likely that he was allergic to something placed in the hall, and was trying to stop the snot from flowing out his nose instead of using a tissue which he did not have.

It is even more likely that Democratic operatives put something on his easel to promote the sinus trouble.
 
This is a huge story. The mic was rigged. It was a psy-op.

silenced auditorium mic > no crowd reaction > monkey see money do > voters at home watching hear deadpan silence after Trumps key proposals and cheers for Hillary = herd runs over the cliff.
 
Last edited:
yes, definitely allergic reaction, allergic to the truth.

Do you have any realistic evidence to back up your assertion? This after all is someone who doesn't even drink.

It is more likely that he was allergic to something placed in the hall, and was trying to stop the snot from flowing out his nose instead of using a tissue which he did not have.

It is even more likely that Democratic operatives put something on his easel to promote the sinus trouble.
 
definitely, Trump lost the election because of an audio issue during the first debate.

This is a huge story. The mic was rigged. It was a psy-op.

silenced auditorium mic > no crowd reaction > monkey see money do > voters at home watching hear deadpan silence after Trumps key proposals and cheers for Hillary = herd runs over the cliff.
 
Back
Top