how do you chalk up 6 Trillion to a yawner.Sure, it's a unlikely crisis to the tune of... $6 trillion. Yawn.
how do you chalk up 6 Trillion to a yawner.Sure, it's a unlikely crisis to the tune of... $6 trillion. Yawn.
We do the printing as a response to the unlikely general loss of confidence, not to start it.
We can and would raise the money through various means, and pay it on a schedule. No investor believes that in a crisis they're going to get all their money back, and immediately. When it comes, they already know they've lost.how do you chalk up 6 Trillion to a yawner.
Yes.Really? Is that what we were responding to these last few years of trillions of dollars of QE?
Global commodities visa vis the USD. And other currencies. Yes, China is a big one.We can and would raise the money through various means, and pay it on a schedule. No investor believes that in a crisis they're going to get all their money back, and immediately. When it comes, they already know they've lost.
And you're fearing some meteoric fall in confidence in the US economy, so what country will have the meteoric rise, China? Maybe in 150 years.
I just don't see it happening. Not even our parents, the British Empire, suffered that fate.Global commodities visa vis the USD. And other currencies. Yes, China is a big one.
Two sides make a marketI just don't see it happening. Not even our parents, the British Empire, suffered that fate.

Yes.
What I meant was, QE was a response to the crisis, not the cause of the crisis.So QE was meant to instill confidence in US Government securities? Wow, I'm trying to see how you can be this far gone, but I'm not coming up with much.
What I meant was, QE was a response to the crisis, not the cause of the crisis.