Dear Main Stream Media...

I understand your aversion based upon his loose lips. I don't think any of us know "what kind of man" he really is other than his locker room talk. (Odumbo has never been caught on mic saying the kind of things Trump has... and look what a disaster Odumbo has been.) As for his "make America great again"... that's yet to be determined if at all.

No, we don't know what kind of man he is other than what he presents in public. Given that your public presentation should be better not worse than your private presentation, I cringe to think of what Trump is really like.

Obama has been caught on an open mic many times. Including referring to "gotta have them ribs and pussy". Additionally, he's someone who used heavy drugs, a megalomaniac and a whole host of other unsavory things.
 
Obama has been caught on an open mic many times. Including referring to "gotta have them ribs and pussy"

I hadn't heard that.

Guess it's a good thing we have the choice between "obviously horrible" and "perhaps less horrible" choice in November...
 
I hadn't heard that.

Guess it's a good thing we have the choice between "obviously horrible" and "perhaps less horrible" choice in November...

Google it. You'll get a youtube video of him saying it. It's just as revolting as Trumps comment, with the exception that the media didn't cover it (of course).
 

Perhaps if that website spent more time on responding to the email that pointed out the impropriety than trying to make it snarky, they might have presented a better case. But using excuses like: "The donation was monetary, not "cash."" - I mean really. Who gives a damn whether it was cash or electronic? Liberals like yourself, perhaps.

There are a number of "pay for play" issues that were raised. This was just one. You don't have to believe it - and I'm sure you wouldn't believe it if you had a video of Clinton robbing a bank in broad daylight. That's fine. I'm not asking you to believe it. In fact, I'm not asking you for anything. Vote for whomever you wish. Er...wait, never mind. You can't.

But if it were as you and...what was the site called? Petticoatdespot? Sorry, never heard of it before today. But if it were as Petticoat claimed, then why did Clinton advisors defend the move in the email saying it is a “legal gray area”?

You don't have to answer that if you don't care to. Or you can just respond with more empty snark if it makes you happy. There's just so much dirt on the democrats out there this time around that folks like you and Petticoatdespot could spend all their lives (which you seem to do, by the way) trying to wipe it clean and make excuses and you still wouldn't even make a dent.
 
Raised? Sure. Just like I am now raising the concern that Trump is really a reptile in an orange Halloween outfit. If you're still shopping for a suitable Clinton Foundation corruption issue to get behind but can't decide what to go with, perhaps this site might help:

http://www.snopes.com/search/?q=clinton+foundation+corruption

Let me know when you strike gold.


d2d11d8208bf7895eec690233e674bcb.jpg


We know of at least one person who falls for everything they say.
 
Not that we needed verification, but the media is so far up Clinton's butt that they may never exit.
They keep each other informed of their activities.
====


Wikileaks -- Naming who in the press will write what story before they are released
released by Wikileaks

Posted on 10/21/2016, 2:56:46 PM by grey_whiskers

Re: July 8th Nightly Press Traffic Summary



From:aelrod@hillaryclinton.com

To: jlehrich@hillaryclinton.com

Date: 2015-07-09 12:15

Subject: Re: July 8th Nightly Press Traffic Summary



oh and yes, jose is aware

On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Adrienne Elrod wrote:

> John- she is filing it today. Tony/research are helping us out together > pushback. Any thoughts you might have would be great. Definitely an oppo > research dump of a story.

>

> Sent from my iPhone

>

> On Jul 9, 2015, at 9:22 AM, Jesse Lehrich

> wrote: >

> looping Adrienne, who I believe has been in touch with Jose

>

> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 12:51 AM, John Podesta

> wrote:

>

>> Does Jose know HuffPo piece is coming?

>>

>>

>> On Wednesday, July 8, 2015, Jesse Lehrich

>> wrote:

>>

>>> *July 8th Nightly Press Traffic Summary*

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> - Peter Nicholas (WSJ) is doing a story for Friday on caucus

>>> organizing efforts and the Sanders campaign's theory that caucuses will be

>>> good for them in the same way that they were for Obama. We've pushed back

>>> with our theory of the case, including our strong organizing effort in Iowa

>>> and beyond.

>>>

>>>

>>> - Per CTR, Amy Chozick is working on story for this weekend about

>>> how the GOP will attack Hillary, will likely include focus group data

>>> suggesting that trustworthiness and being out-of-touch will be top targets.

>>>

>>>

>>> - Maggie Haberman is doing a write-through of her story on Hillary

>>> Clinton's claim that she had never been subpoenaed for tomorrow's paper

>>> which will include the statement we put out this afternoon.

>>>

>>>

>>> - Michael Scherer (TIME) is working on a story delving into the

>>> claim that Hillary Clinton was under no obligation to turn over 55,000

>>> pages of emails.

>>> - Steven Holmes (CNN) is working on a piece with the premise that

>>> the black vote is the firewall for Hillary Clinton and Sanders is unlikely

>>> to make major inroads there.

>>>

>>>

>>> - Annie Linskey (Boston Globe) is writing for Friday about new

>>> fundraising hosts getting involved in this campaign, specifically females.

>>>

>>>

>>> - Jeremy Diamond (CNN) is doing a piece about the politics of the

>>> BDS movement. It will place heavy focus on the nuances and forces at play

>>> around Hillary Clinton's letter that was sent to presidents of major Jewish

>>> organizations condemning BDS.

>>>

>>>

>>> - Huffington Post is doing a piece on our treasurer Jose Villareal

>>> -- will likely focus at least partially on him sitting on the Walmart board.

>>>

>>>

>>> - Other outstanding stories include:

>>>

>>> o Ruby Cramer on our grassroots organizing

>>>

>>> o Anita Kumar (McClatchy) on where we have organizers and how we've

>>> spent our money during Q2

>>>

>>> o Mike Memoli on our email listbuilding

>>>

>>> o Phil Rucker on HRC talking about gun violence prevention

>>>

>>> o Maggie Haberman/Pat Healy on the costs of Hillary's progressive

>>> proposals

>>>

>>> o Annie Karni on the progression of our media strategy

>>>

>>> o CNN's long-form story about Hillary Clinton/Bernie Sanders' appeal to

>>> minority communities.

>>>

>>> Sent from my iPhone

>>>

>>

>

>

> --

> *Jesse Lehrich* | Rapid Response Communications

> Hillary For America

> 781-307-2254 | @JesseLehrich

> gchat: JesseLehrich

>

> -- Adrienne K. Elrod

Spokesperson Hillary For America

*www.hillaryclinton.com

*

@adrienneelrod
 
d2d11d8208bf7895eec690233e674bcb.jpg


We know of at least one person who falls for everything they say.
I understand that unembellished facts can trouble and upset some people. They can be disconcerting to those with an innate aversion to the truth. On the plus side, I hear that acid absorbs 47 times its own weight in excess reality.
 
Raised? Sure. Just like I am now raising the concern that Trump is really a reptile in an orange Halloween outfit. If you're still shopping for a suitable Clinton Foundation corruption issue to get behind but can't decide what to go with, perhaps this site might help:

http://www.snopes.com/search/?q=clinton+foundation+corruption

Let me know when you strike gold.

I agree that Trump is a reptile. As for Snopes, that site long ago lost its credibility. But I will grant you that it's higher on the scale than petticoat.

Take care.
 
Back
Top