Dear Main Stream Media...

[Scataphagos]

Trump is a gasbag.

Yet to be proven, IMV.

We patriot Americans need to vote for Trump. If you gag on the notion and have to "hold your nose", so be it.

Recall... America gave the 1/2 black man the "benefit of the doubt" to show how we'd "evolved beyond our racist past" as a society. Look how THAT turned out!

Every vote for Trump offsets a vote for Hellary at the minimum. Our Trump votes may not matter in the end. Then again, they might.

 

[Tsing Tao]

Yet to be proven, IMV.

We patriot Americans need to vote for Trump. If you gag on the notion and have to "hold your nose", so be it.

Every vote for Trump offsets a vote for Hellary at the minimum.

Me calling Trump a gasbag is my opinion. Nothing has to be proven at all. It's how I feel and it's my vote we're talking about.

As for the rest, that is precisely what I plan to do (hold my nose), and why. Because I am in Florida, I have no choice. Would that I were in a state that didn't matter...

 

[Tsing Tao]

www.tinfoil/conspiracy

If you were trying to link to something, it doesn't work. If you were trying (key word there) to be sarcastic, I'm not sure how all these Podesta emails I've been reading, or the Vertias videos, etc. can be called a conspiracy, unless you're just set on ignoring anything that doesn't fit your narrative - which wouldn't surprise me about you.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

If you were trying to link to something, it doesn't work.

Right back at you. Because there is no evidence of corruption or pay-for-play or any wrongdoing on Clinton's part, aside from her using a private server. (She apologized. When has Trump ever unequivocally apologized for anything with any specificity? Ever?) You'll just accept any fringe element's conclusions because it's what you want to hear. But as my link demonstrates, the conspiracy theory leads to nowhere.

 

[Scataphagos]

Me calling Trump a gasbag is my opinion. Nothing has to be proven at all. It's how I feel and it's my vote we're talking about.

As for the rest, that is precisely what I plan to do (hold my nose), and why. Because I am in Florida, I have no choice. Would that I were in a state that didn't matter...

Let me run this by you...

Trump hasn't DONE ANYTHING other than loosely run his mouth. That' NOT the same as Hellary's crimes.

Trump hasn't learned to speak like a politician. He hasn't ever had to do so in his world to any degree. He's always been the "boss of his domain". He could say what he wanted, off the cuff, without much forethought and without consequence if you didn't like it. That's because if you're an underling of his, you have to put up with whatever he says or risk getting fired. Or you're a business associate trying to curry his favor and money. (And how are Trump's words that much different from LBJ's whipping out his penis and proclaiming "this is the reason [for whatever I'm doing in Vietnam]... 'cause I gotta big dick". Main difference it that there wasn't youtube to spread that to the world.)

As a politician, things are different. He's trying to curry the favor of people who are not his underlings... the voters. So as a politician, his public words need "restraint and polish" to say the least. (I really wish he hadn't said, "grab women by the pussy"... metaphorically true as that may be. Or that he hadn't said "I love war". That's all "off the cuff, non-couched" talk.) Compared to Hellary's crimes and her disclosed "plans" for America.... well, it should be a no-brainer vote.

 

[Tsing Tao]

Right back at you. Because there is no evidence of corruption or pay-for-play or any wrongdoing on Clinton's part, aside from her using a private server. (She apologized. When has Trump ever unequivocally apologized for anything with any specificity? Ever?) You'll just accept any fringe element's conclusions because it's what you want to hear. But as my link demonstrates, the conspiracy theory leads to nowhere.

Plenty of evidence in Podesta's emails. Unless you're saying he was just "joshin'". If it was false, there would have been serious denials. Instead, they worked to cut off Assange's internet service. Whenever a reporter has the temerity to ask a direct question about these emails to the HRC campaign, he/she is given (before being moved from the "nice" to "naughty" list) a canned response and told that the email in question wasn't authenticated, or some other political speak. Why not just say "they're completely fabricated"? Because they know they aren't.

As for Trump apologizing for anything, the only thing I can recall was him apologizing for that disgusting audio tape with Billy Bush from a decade ago.

 

[Tsing Tao]

Let me run this by you...

Trump hasn't DONE ANYTHING other than loosely run his mouth. That' NOT the same as Hellary's crimes.

Trump hasn't learned to speak like a politician. He hasn't ever had to do so in his world to any degree. He's always been the "boss of his domain". He could say what he wanted, off the cuff, without much forethought and without consequence if you didn't like it. That's because if you're an underling of his, you have to put up with whatever he says or risk getting fired. Or you're a business associate trying to curry his favor and money.

As a politician, things are different. He's trying to curry the favor of people who are not his underlings... the voters. So as a politician, his public words need "restraint and polish" to say the least. (I really wish he hadn't said, "grab women by the pussy"... metaphorically true as that may be. Or that he hadn't said "I love war". That's all "off the cuff, non-couched" talk.) Compared to Hellary's crimes and her disclosed "plans" for America.... well, it should be a no-brainer vote.

No argument with your points. But Trump isn't the quality of person I would want running the country. Fortunately for him (in regards to my vote), he's a better choice than Clinton. But that's not saying much. I would have preferred to vote for Bernie, but the Democrats would have none of that.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

Plenty of evidence in Podesta's emails. Unless you're saying he was just "joshin'". If it was false, there would have been serious denials. Instead, they worked to cut off Assange's internet service. Whenever a reporter has the temerity to ask a direct question about these emails to the HRC campaign, he/she is given (before being moved from the "nice" to "naughty" list) a canned response and told that the email in question wasn't authenticated, or some other political speak. Why not just say "they're completely fabricated"? Because they know they aren't.

As for Trump apologizing for anything, the only thing I can recall was him apologizing for that disgusting audio tape with Billy Bush from a decade ago.

You cited "corruption" earlier. What has Hillary Clinton done that equates to corruption?

Second question: What do you think the odds are of Trump winning?

 

[Scataphagos]

Trump isn't the quality of person I would want running the country.

I understand your aversion based upon his loose lips. I don't think any of us know "what kind of man" he really is other than his locker room talk. (Odumbo has never been caught on mic saying the kind of things Trump has... and look what a disaster Odumbo has been.) As for his "make America great again"... that's yet to be determined if at all.

 

[Tsing Tao]

You cited "corruption" earlier. What has Hillary Clinton done that equates to corruption?

Second question: What do you think the odds are of Trump winning?

As a quick answer and one example for your first question, removing Algeria from the terror watch list in exchange for a donation to the Clinton foundation.

For your second question, my personal belief is that the odds are not in Trump's favor.