Quote from Purple Barney:
Ok no where did you say edge was about commissions or cost? Well what in the world is this edge you are talking about then. Your whole point was equities was a bad choice because of the high vig. Thats not talking about cost?
Ok so equities trade CAN be profitable... but just not that profitable? I'm confused. I thought trading(any kind) was scalable. So if any trading can be profitable(at all) consistently, it can be scaled up to yield larger profits. So if once i learn how to profitably trade 100 shares, why can't i do the same with 100,000? How can it be "dead" and profitable at the same time, given trading's scalable nature?
Quote from Maverick74:
Surf, most of the money made in equities now is in PIPEs. There are guys that can eek out a living if they run an efficient auto-bot themselves. But they need to trade millions of shares a day and being paying rates about 1/10th of what this guy was offered. Sure, eeking out a living is possible. But why not be a public school teacher then? At least you get benefits, a pension and some job security. Who the hell wants to eek out a living trading? LOL.
Quote from Maverick74:
Dave, if PIPES is so yesterday then equity daytrading is so 1999! I trade neither.

Quote from Maverick74:
The definition of edge is something one has that others do not have. Not easy replicatable. Anyone can get lower commisions. The reason I brought up vig is because I said equities have a high VIG and therefore REQUIRE an edge to overcome. You understand?
And no, equity trading is not very scalable. Not at all. Hence the reason why I said some guys can be marginally profitable. You can't just say, Oh, I can trade 5k shares in RIMM nicely, I'll just start trading 100k shares, LOL. I'm afraid it does not work like that. Liquidity is a huge concern in equities which is why I brought up futures.
The more shares you trade in equities, the higher your vig becomes and the more edge you are going to need to overcome it. Hence the reason I brought up PIPES earlier. It's one of the only ways I know of to scale equities with edge. It's also why that is the new frontier in equity trading.
Quote from Purple Barney:
Ok now we are back to what I was talking about before.
"The definition of edge is something one has that others do not have. Not easy replicatable."
YEAH. Hence edge = skill.
Like someone earlier said, your edge is whats in between your ears. When you are more skilled than the majority of traders, you take their money. The problem, and hard part, is the process of learning it takes to become better than everyone else.
You have already acknowledged the existence of skill in trading. So if there IS skill, then there are levels of skill. THAT is your edge. At least that is what mine has to be. Being more skilled than most.
As for the liquidity problem, once i have that problem, I'm sure I will be moving to the products you suggested, and when I have that problem, I'm sure I will be making way more than a school teacher already.
Quote from marketsurfer:
funny!
http://www.thestreet.com/_googlen/markets/matthewgoldstein/10193701.html
are we talking about the same thing??
![]()
Quote from Maverick74:
Yup, that's them!


Quote from Maverick74:
No, edge and skill are not the same thing. Not even close. You cannot learn an edge. Think about the contradiction in that statement for a second. Are you thinking.................keep thinking........think some more..........OK, just a little more..........OK, do you see the contradiction?
If one could learn an edge, then it wouldn't be an edge by definition. Right? So this goes back to my ORIGINAL question. If you are relying on skill to make money. Then why not use that skill to apply to a product that has the SMALLEST vig? I understand that you are familiar with equities, but what does familiarity have to do with skill?