Quote from Tacsian:
Two thoughts...
MrMarket, you mentioned something on the theme of knowing more than the markets etc...I wonder if this is an impossibility tautologically...the markets have a price at close today for any stock you want to name...and the bottom line is, if you own that stock today, that's what you can get for it. Whether the prospects for appreciation are x or y for any given stock, the market is the final arbiter and the closing bell (disregarding afterhours trading of course) is the bottom line today. I understand FA and agree that finding "value" in a company and a high probability of a target in the future if everything goes as planned are skills to some extent, honed with experience and some hard work and yes, a bit of intellectual acumen necessary to Think ahead. But until any given stock truly does grow at such and such a rate, and produce earnings for this quarter or that quarter, it hasn't managed it yet and the market says: "here is what i'll pay you today for that company." In 4 to 6 weeks (your standard targeted time I *think* from your posts) the market may say different. But at no time in the 4 to 6 weeks, or before, or after, was the market ever wrong about the price or value of any company. Potential value is just that, potential....and Sept. 11ths, Martha Stewarts, Enrons and other sundry smaller incidents like the suicide or car accident claiming the life of a CEO can all impact Potential value, regardless of due diligence. You play probabilities well according to things that "make sense" to you. I just don't think its a matter of being ahead of or better than the market itself.
Second thought...whether its "average" or not, or involved "superior" intellect..a guy like John Henry, net worth 600 million to 1 billion, has used a very simple technical trend following system, as have many turtles. Whatever one thinks of the turtles, one can't dispute that a truly simple set of mathematical rules, (i.e. buy at new 40 day high, stop at last 20 day low, etc etc) hasn't produced signifant returns and fortunes for many. I'm not knocking your FA with a smidge of technical signals that are the precursor to you even engaging in the FA, but to say that TA alone is "lesser", well I think that's naively dismissive of what the power of TA, properly understood by some and applied by some, can achieve on its own. We all know the world of CNBC is populated by those who can't use either FA or TA very well quite often. Most traders can't either, no matter what their timeframe...but just as most people can't hit a bullseye with every dart throw, the flaw isnt in the dart, its in the people.
Just some thoughts...
I like it...let's hear more!