Daytrading ES

That's not a problem. That's an advantage. 10 to 15 points potential profit instead of 6 to 8 ticks.
Watch the move today.

I agree with you. But for someone with a $1000 account with no plan or experience, it is a problem. But I'm with you, I love the intraday vol since 2019 ended.
 
Fixed income, and I would add currency futures too, are "easier" to trade than the ES, in my experience.

Looking at his post, it is possible that he simply didn't write it clearly enough for me to understand his full meaning. But his "It always amazes me" and then the "would be traders do not understand" and the "small cracks of inefficiency," and especially that last phrase.

Well, you just wrote yourself that there are markets that are easier to trade than ES in your experience. So, it seems like you're in agreement?

Whenever I read anyone saying anything like that I get tingling behind my upper bullshit detector.

So, if he'd care to present us with an example of such a "small crack of inefficiency" I'm all ears.

But it won't be coming. And such people have a built in "No way am I going to give away my edge" response.

Well, the thing is if you have something unique that's currently working you want to exploit that. Not share it and by doing so possibly making it go away. The exception would be if you once had an edge that is no longer working. DE Shaw (the hedge fund) wouldn't even share redundant strategies in a Market Wizards interview because they considered that a potential advantage for the competition. There was I believe a few examples of traders who found anamolies/mispricings in the Market Wizards that they were able to exploit and which eventually went away. One guy was quoting prices in illiquid stocks and made his initial pile doing that.

I think people have different ideas in mind when the word edge is used.

When the word inefficiency is used I interpret that to mean that the market is not correctly priced. For example, if you could accurately calculate the spread between ES futures and the S&P 500 index, you could do a pair trade whenever they get out of whack and collect risk free money as they get back in line. This is however not something a retail trader can do as it's done by computers and the result is that the index/futures are pretty much always in lock-step and not out of whack at all. Essentially, arbitrage is risk-free money.

With instruments that are less traded mispricings are more likely to occur and potentially exploited. I assume that's what meant.

Fact is an "edge" could mean many, many things.

But I agree that it would be nice to hear more from that poster.
 
Could you expand on this comment?

For directional (day) trading it seems to me like the e-mini S&P 500 futures have been a fantastic trading instrument for the last few years. The liquidity is there to get quickly in and out with small trading costs and the ability to move size.
For those exact reasons, I think it is unlikely that any systematic inefficiency would be left on the table by this guy and others that have been at it for a couple of decades:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Simons_(mathematician)

Couldn't you argue the same for any instrument, strategy and time period. That every systematic inefficiency has been arbitraged away? Yes. But if Jim Simons would leave anything on the table it would be much less profitable than a strategy based on S&P 500 e-mini futures where as you say you have the ability "to move size."
 
Looking at his post, it is possible that he simply didn't write it clearly enough for me to understand his full meaning. But his "It always amazes me" and then the "would be traders do not understand" and the "small cracks of inefficiency," and especially that last phrase. Whenever I read anyone saying anything like that I get tingling behind my upper bullshit detector.

So, if he'd care to present us with an example of such a "small crack of inefficiency" I'm all ears.

But it won't be coming. And such people have a built in "No way am I going to give away my edge" response.

Such people include Jim Simons. If he had given away his edge every time someone asked, there would be no Medallion Fund. Why would you give away any edge to see it arbitraged away?
 
For those exact reasons, I think it is unlikely that any systematic inefficiency would be left on the table by this guy and others that have been at it for a couple of decades:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Simons_(mathematician)

Couldn't you argue the same for any instrument, strategy and time period. That every systematic inefficiency has been arbitraged away? Yes. But if Jim Simons would leave anything on the table it would be much less profitable than a strategy based on S&P 500 e-mini futures where as you say you have the ability "to move size."

Yes. Probably. See my prior comment on arbitrage.

Regardless, the ES market is clearly not random and it moves sufficiently on a daily basis. This can be exploited. Easy? No. Possible? Most certainly.

An untradeable market for me would be one that was completely random and which moved around in a very narrow range.

In some past periods this may have been true for ES. At least the narrow range part. These days it's moving around greatly from day to day. This can be exploited.
 
My biggest issue with trading the ES are the Algo's constantly hunting your stops & chopping the market in a range instead of breaking out on one side.

Makes it worse when I overtrade and after noon when the Algo's take over. Force of habit!
 
Last edited:
Today was a predictable inside day on the S&P 500 following a larger move down. If you expected continuation either higher or lower today you could quite possibly get smoked buying high and selling low.

As important as it is to learn how to trade it's very important to know when not to trade.

Simply put:

If you don't know what's going on or have a rational expectation to make a profit; don't trade.

The more you learn/understand the more you can trade/participate. That's obvious, because if you don't know anything, you shouldn't be doing anything. Just sit on your ass and watch and see if you can catch on. :)
 
Everything is predictable with hindsight. :rolleyes:

If you see what I posted in the ES journal that prediction was posted before the bell rang today.

EDIT: By the way. I use a predictive model for that. But I’m sure an experienced chartist/trader could come to the same conclusion without one.
 
Back
Top