Daytrading Breakouts in the ES

Status
Not open for further replies.
Quote from Walther:



First of all I did not ask you for your personal financial details from you, only for number of trades and % of winners this method could produce
. Am I the only one who would like to know this ?
You should have just tell me that you do not feel like doing it and that would be it. You decided to make it personal and called me names .
So for a record , You are full of shit when you posting that you do not know how many trades you did. You just do not want to include losing ones.
According to my records you have only 45 % of winners, if you follow your rules, and I just wanted to compare my records with yours to see if I am doing it right.
Because you got sooo touchy I am convinced that results are not that great.
Walter

Retracements is where it's at, screw breakouts:D
 

Attachments

Quote from Walther:



Am I the only one who would like to know this ?

Probably so..


Because you got sooo touchy I am convinced that results are not that great.


So then you have no interest in this thread. Stop posting and just go away. PLEASE
 
Quote from Walther:



And I did post 4 weeks of papertrading with method fully disclosed and summaries, you lying piece of shit . Loose your blindfolds and get some rabies shots.
Walter

Walter - with all due respect, you did not "fully disclose your method". All you did was post times, and would not tell anyone how you arrived at those times.

So, make sure you tell the truth when you are making your posts, please.
 
Quote from baggerlord:

Get lost. Keep tweaking your indicators and one of these days you will find a system that backtests profitably.

Get on your knees loser, Johnie is coming
 
Quote from baggerlord:

Picked up two more points buying off the support at 1008.5, that used to be resistance when we were in the morning range.

Yesterday I posted an idea regarding retracement and JR pointed out that getting into a lot of extraneous spurs and offshoots and tangents would only confuse matters, particularly since most of those following this thread continue, apparently, to have trouble recognizing the "model" setup. And he's right. Which is why I haven't made any more such posts.

Therefore, if you have an idea for a corollary strategy, why not start your own thread? Otherwise, telling us how you picked up two points doing this and two points doing that only clouds the chief issue, which is contained in the initial posts.
 
Quote from kernan:



Walter - with all due respect, you did not "fully disclose your method". All you did was post times, and would not tell anyone how you arrived at those times.

So, make sure you tell the truth when you are making your posts, please.

Did I post rules ? Did I post W/L ? Did I post results ?
 
Quote from dbphoenix:



Yesterday I posted an idea regarding retracement and JR pointed out that getting into a lot of extraneous spurs and offshoots and tangents would only confuse matters, particularly since most of those following this thread continue, apparently, to have trouble recognizing the "model" setup. And he's right. Which is why I haven't made any more such posts.

Therefore, if you have an idea for a corollary strategy, why not start your own thread? Otherwise, telling us how you picked up two points doing this and two points doing that only clouds the chief issue, which is contained in the initial posts.


Ahhhh, my bad. No more. Part of the problem is this system is so easy there isn't much to talk about! We had one fantastic setup this morning and it only got two posts, but I know at least me and one other picked up the 4 pts off it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top