Daytrader's Only

[The General]

Quote from Dackster:

The General,

Even though your best intentions were to aid the pupils in the 'early learning center', it's probably too much for thier small IQs to handle. Take Trader666 for instance, with his constant waffling about kids drinks and posting the same old pictures over and over again. He's so tedious, a garden variety sucker, he will never 'get it' as long as he has a hole in his backside.

Here's how you should approach T666.


Hello Trader666, have you been a good boy today? Have you been studying your pattern book? Did any of your patterns match todays action. Good boy!

Which is your favourite pattern, Trader666?

That is a lovely pattern isn't it, a 'Cup and Handle', how pretty.

Look everbody, little Trader666 is drinking out of his 'Cup and Handle', he's drinking his favourite kool-aid, strawberry flavour.


Now run along to the toilet little Trader666, before you pee yourself.




Dackster.

Dackster-

How did you forget the-whats it called-play ger ism

What a bunch of muppets-really

The General

 

[The General]

Quote from Topper:

actually if you read between the lines, generals purpose on et isn't a very nice one. he's not a very nice person. lot of naive people out there

have you a problem with The General?

if so-tough shit-The General always speaks the truth-but what would most around here know about that-not much!

The General

 

[MandelbrotSet]

Quote from Dackster:

Unfortunately i myself cannot help you with this little number, may i suggest that you put this one to Trader666. Once he gets home from working on the building site, ablutes himself and feeds, then i'm sure he will be of the very best service to you.



Dackster.

Let us know when you come up for air. :eek:

 

[Dackster]

Now listen here, all of you flea pickers and skin peelers. This thread was initially set up to cover the subject of loss, and the psychology of loss. The thread was very quickly divided into two camps, both having an opposite train of thought to each other. One was the professional attitude to loss, and the other was the attitude of the rank amateur. Clever money, dumb money, winner, loser, is contrasted by the two camps.

Firstly, lets look at the amateur camp, the dumb money. We've got the likes of Mandy and T666 'pin pointing' the losses that The General made. This is because the amateur holds a losing trade very close to himself, i'll explain. The amateur views his trading in a very fearful way, because deep down in the amateur psyche, is the trading unknown. The amateur does not fully understand his market, his 'system' or 'method', even his own ability or anything. He sees his patterns and lines etc being battered and torn by the market everyday, day in day out, and so losses are bad and wins are good.

Now, let's look at the professional camp, the clever money. This is where the likes of myself, The General, Mr Hershey and a few others on ET lie. One trade to the professional is just one trade, it's all positive, there is no negativity. The professional makes a trade, if it goes against him it's a gauge on the market, if it goes for him, it's a gauge on the market. The pro trader has a very different outlook, longterm, compared to the amateur who trades with fear, insecurity and unknowing.

There is so much of a division between the professional and the amateur, it is quite obvious that books are not the answer. I am myself a great believer in the saying that, 'traders are born and not made'.




Dackster.

 

[Johno]

from Dackster in the above post

Now, let's look at the professional camp, the clever money. This is where the likes of myself, The General, Mr Hershey and a few others on ET lie.

Now Dackster,would the reference to "LIE" be a fraudian slip?

Regards

Johno

 

[Dackster]

Quote from Johno:

from Dackster in the above post

Now, let's look at the professional camp, the clever money. This is where the likes of myself, The General, Mr Hershey and a few others on ET lie.

Now Dackster,would the reference to "LIE" be a fraudian slip?

Regards

Johno

That's your context Johno, not mine. Oops, i think you 'slipped' on your banana skin.



Dackster.

 

[Johno]

Quote from Dackster:

That's your context Johno, not mine. Oops, i think you 'slipped' on your banana skin.



Dackster.

But lets be honest, thats the context that an intelligent observant poster would recognize as accurate!

Regards

Johno

 

[MandelbrotSet]

Quote from Johno:

from Dackster in the above post

Now, let's look at the professional camp, the clever money. This is where the likes of myself, The General, Mr Hershey and a few others on ET lie.

Now Dackster,would the reference to "LIE" be a fraudian slip?

Regards

Johno

+1

ZING!

 

[The General]

Quote from Johno:

But lets be honest, thats the context that an intelligent observant poster would recognize as accurate!

Regards

Johno

It is obvious who the dim wits are-even if they think otherwise.

We do this for a reason-one that very few understand-or will ever get near understanding.

So-post away-and why not join mandy and 999 with the links and pictures

Dumb ass "traders"

The General

 

[Johno]

Quote from The General:

It is obvious who the dim wits are-even if they think otherwise.

We do this for a reason-one that very few understand-or will ever get near understanding.

So-post away-and why not join mandy and 999 with the links and pictures

Dumb ass "traders"

The General

I think I know where you're cumming from

There was an article about some bloke being caught shagging a dog, he apparently knew exactly why he had done the dog, very few of us could understand why though, and I don't think that we ever really will!

Funnily enough after that people avoided him, apparently he too thought they didn't understand and really all that was required was a change of attitude on their part.

So I have no doubt that most people do in fact understand exactly what you're about! And for the ones that don't, think about the ignorant mongrols and " lock up your dogs"

Regards

Johno