Quote from RedDuke:
Based on everything that was recently posted here. It looks like limit orders are the way to go for stocks. However, the futures are a different story. It all depends what is more important to ones strategy. Definitely being in the trade via market order or getting a little better price with limit order at the expense of missing the trade.
Really good posts everyone. Thanks a lot.
redduke
It does seem like the peanut galary claims that limit orders are better, however how can you truely believe this when there was no numbers that were put out.
It's like the whole stupid immigration debate. You hear all these ANTI immigration idiots saying "they take welfare money:, "they clog up hospitals and don't pay" "they cause crime" while the PRO immigration people say "It saves tax payers tons of $$$"
And both of these idiot groups will battle this forever when really a calcuation of the following equation is need.
(negative effects of immigration) is greater than or less than (positive effects of immigration)
if you don't have numbers how can you really make an accurate judgement.
So market orders vs limit. There was no data that was presented, only reasons why certain lmiit is better than market and why market is better than limit.
The question is, is it worth it to pay the small tick for every order and lose of on the big catch or vice versa.
Limit: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -7 = -7
Mkt: -1 -1 -1 -1 - 1 - 1 -1 -1 = -8
From the following example limit would be better.
