I've been known to do that. It just depends on what I think will work for me on any given day. But, generally, two contracts one strike wide will generate a slightly higher ROI that one contract two strikes wide. Two strikes wide can be useful if you think you might be adjusting the trade before it expires. It would allow you to move up or down one strike whereas a contract that is only one strike wide forces you to move at least two strikes. But it is better to avoid adjustments altogether. The are costly and, in my personal experience, not necessary, if you've set the trade up properly to begin with. With a track record of being 100% WRONG when it comes to adjusting a trade, I can say that with a fairly high degree of certainty. In every single instance, had I simply held the position I took when I entered the trade, I'd have made money. I've either lost or made considerably less on every one that I've adjusted.Why not simply trade one lot x 10-wide?
mmm... let me see...?
If a guy could pull off a 100% ROI.... and he did that only once a week....starting with only $2,000..... compounded... that would work out to $9,007,199,254,140,990,000 by the end of the year..... mmm... at a 38% tax rate that would be $3,422,735,716,801,580,000.....
Hey!!! That would pay off the National Debt !
NONE OF WHAT I HAVE POSTED HERE SHOULD BE CONSTRUED AS ADVICE.
UPDATE: Since I had hit the PDT threshold