"Oh the YM, you have to get a real big move or trade minimum double your normal lot size, or commissions will eat any profit you get"
dumbest thing i've read in a while
8 - 10 YM points = approximately 1 ES point
most brokers charge roughly the same commission for a ES vs. YM trade
YM gives u much better spread. so please explain how a 1 point move in ES doesn't "eat any profit" but a 8 point move in YM DOES.
YM is more profitable for most scalping purposes since the spread is better . you have a spread of less than 1/2 the ES. unless you are playing pure marketmaker microscalps (selling ask/buying bid of .25 increments) in ES, the YM is much more cost efficient.
you do not need to "double your normal" size.
One ES point is $50
10 YM is $50 (and it has better spread)
i find it hard to believe that u are actually a trader if u can't understand this
second of all, the comments about ETF's are also wrong
the ETF's are arb'd by the same people who trade the cash baskets and the futures.
they cannot move that disparately at all from the futures because arbitrage makes that a profit opportunity.
i traded my YM strategy for about 9 months using DIA.
DIA actually has worse fills than YM (and SPY worse than ES).
in periods of frenzied market activities i have seen crossed bid/ask on SPY and DIA. i have NEVER seen this EVER in YM.
simply put, DIA and SPY have worse fills than YM/ES not the other way around.
DIA and SPY SSF's are even worse than that, fwiw
you could get the "functional equivalent" of trading YM by trading 500 share blocks of DIA.
those would both yield you $5 per dow point. but the DIA would give you inferior tax treatment, poorer fills, fewer hours of live trading, etc.
if u understand how arbitrage (and fungibility) works, you will see that DIA *has* to move in sync with YM
ETF's are just less scary because they aren't "scary futures"
if the bottom drops out of YM, I can guarantee you that DIA won't offer any more safety
dumbest thing i've read in a while
8 - 10 YM points = approximately 1 ES point
most brokers charge roughly the same commission for a ES vs. YM trade
YM gives u much better spread. so please explain how a 1 point move in ES doesn't "eat any profit" but a 8 point move in YM DOES.
YM is more profitable for most scalping purposes since the spread is better . you have a spread of less than 1/2 the ES. unless you are playing pure marketmaker microscalps (selling ask/buying bid of .25 increments) in ES, the YM is much more cost efficient.
you do not need to "double your normal" size.
One ES point is $50
10 YM is $50 (and it has better spread)
i find it hard to believe that u are actually a trader if u can't understand this
second of all, the comments about ETF's are also wrong
the ETF's are arb'd by the same people who trade the cash baskets and the futures.
they cannot move that disparately at all from the futures because arbitrage makes that a profit opportunity.
i traded my YM strategy for about 9 months using DIA.
DIA actually has worse fills than YM (and SPY worse than ES).
in periods of frenzied market activities i have seen crossed bid/ask on SPY and DIA. i have NEVER seen this EVER in YM.
simply put, DIA and SPY have worse fills than YM/ES not the other way around.
DIA and SPY SSF's are even worse than that, fwiw

you could get the "functional equivalent" of trading YM by trading 500 share blocks of DIA.
those would both yield you $5 per dow point. but the DIA would give you inferior tax treatment, poorer fills, fewer hours of live trading, etc.
if u understand how arbitrage (and fungibility) works, you will see that DIA *has* to move in sync with YM
ETF's are just less scary because they aren't "scary futures"
if the bottom drops out of YM, I can guarantee you that DIA won't offer any more safety

