Quote from Frank Furter:
Hey Maverick,
I appreciate your input and for all you have shared on ET. I certainly am not claiming I have the answer, and I am always willing to question what I do. I was just pointing out something I see happening over and over again.
What I see quite often is that a failed a down / a up is often a headfake, and the previous day (or days) level is the gotcha leaning the wrong way point. That is why I always keep those on my radar.
While I type this, crude stopped to the tick of a daily level 3 days ago and provided roughly 40 ticks on that play.
Maybe the problem is that I am not truly playing by the exact ACD rules, so I guess I should not use A levels etc when I post.
Again, always willing to debate and question what I do. Love your work ... keep it up![]()
Yes and that is precisely why that happens! Once a level works, it will have a tendency to keep working because if price failed there three days ago, everyone sees that. In general I don't like levels like that. Yes, they work, to a point. But there is no meaningful price action that can be gleamed from that. You can take any level in a product and if price fails there and comes back, it's most likely going to fail again. You can create these levels randomly. Just pull up any chart that paused at some level and go back over the last few months and see how many times price stopped there. You'll notice it happened a lot. But just keep in mind, that level is now obvious to everyone. Anybody can look at a chart see double tops or triple bottoms. If trading were that easy, half of ET would be billionaires! LOL.