milimabuse
hence: always 50/50 chance per se
OHH, yes !!! a 50/50 probability scenario ⦠Great you just discovered the solution for successful trading. The only thing you have to do is optimize MM. Find the right timeframe for four S/R levels with 8:1 or more R/R and problem solve!!!, given that you know your odds and are blindly trading S/R your stops must be very very very tight and your targets far away so just sit down and accept your tiny 50% bad trades because the other half will compensate and make millions. You will need an investor approach (longer timeframes) based solely on this and some extra fundamental analysis if you want, patience, consistency, capital, capital, capital and time. Just sit and enjoy the ride, you have discovered the Holy Grail.
Although milimabuse bitter comments clearly reflect some bad previous experiences daytrading, I must admit that he is right on the âTOO MANY upport and resistance zones in TOO MANY timeframesâ. S/R and Trendlines are surprisingly misplaced and misunderstood, usually as consequences of problems recognizing the basics (High and Lows), or the implications of multiple timeframes.
In any case and to be relevant to this thread, this post just reminded me to a fellow French trader that once sent me CAC40 chart like this (this is not the one btw) asking me for comments on his trading approach:
My opinion was and is âI donât have a clue what are your doing or seeing but if the convergence of 100s of S/R, Trendlines, Fibs and Ganns lines are making you see the matrix, great just keep doing itâ
I do agree with Bigâs core concept but in my opinion more important that the validity of the assumption â ⦠when it comes to their money, men usually have a very good memoryâ is what are the implications (if any) of this levels and what do we do with that information. I am not an expert on trendlines but I will comment on what are for me the basic flaws when analyzing these levels.
Iâll continue later.
jjrvat
hence: always 50/50 chance per se
OHH, yes !!! a 50/50 probability scenario ⦠Great you just discovered the solution for successful trading. The only thing you have to do is optimize MM. Find the right timeframe for four S/R levels with 8:1 or more R/R and problem solve!!!, given that you know your odds and are blindly trading S/R your stops must be very very very tight and your targets far away so just sit down and accept your tiny 50% bad trades because the other half will compensate and make millions. You will need an investor approach (longer timeframes) based solely on this and some extra fundamental analysis if you want, patience, consistency, capital, capital, capital and time. Just sit and enjoy the ride, you have discovered the Holy Grail.
Although milimabuse bitter comments clearly reflect some bad previous experiences daytrading, I must admit that he is right on the âTOO MANY upport and resistance zones in TOO MANY timeframesâ. S/R and Trendlines are surprisingly misplaced and misunderstood, usually as consequences of problems recognizing the basics (High and Lows), or the implications of multiple timeframes.
In any case and to be relevant to this thread, this post just reminded me to a fellow French trader that once sent me CAC40 chart like this (this is not the one btw) asking me for comments on his trading approach:
My opinion was and is âI donât have a clue what are your doing or seeing but if the convergence of 100s of S/R, Trendlines, Fibs and Ganns lines are making you see the matrix, great just keep doing itâ
I do agree with Bigâs core concept but in my opinion more important that the validity of the assumption â ⦠when it comes to their money, men usually have a very good memoryâ is what are the implications (if any) of this levels and what do we do with that information. I am not an expert on trendlines but I will comment on what are for me the basic flaws when analyzing these levels.
Iâll continue later.
jjrvat