Ironfist,
I am not going to micro details in your post because I think 90% of the problems you mentioned in your posts are related to the macro picture. IMHO,
either you are diminishing the importance of the basic premises (minimizing risk, order or analysis, delimiting your Trading Field and price analysis) or you are overseeing these factors in favor of the technicalities of your PBP (indicators, triggers, stops, drawdowns, etc). In any case, some very concise comments:
1. On Thursday 29th May you post â
I've been more profitable over the past 2 weeks of paper trading than ever beforeâ so I am going to assume that your last posts referred only to the âproblemsâ of your PBP and not how to squeeze more profits from your good trades
(âgreedâ)
2. Timeframe: It appears to me that you donât fully comprehend the dimension of the 500 VOL YM chart. You complained that there are some trades that donât respect HH/LL and they move a lot and there are other âperfect setupsâ that miserably fail without even 1 tick in your favor. What is the average true range of the waves in a 500 VOL YM chart? What about in a âperfect setupâ WAVE? In what % of these ranges are your targets? Stops?. What are the probabilities (in your experience) of having a good trade when you respect your PBP? And when you donât? what about drawdowns?
3. Time: âI have not found a certain time of day to be more profitable than others, so I try to take every trading opportunity that presents itselfâ In my opinion this is a big mistake at the beginning. If you try to trade every single move during a day you are only increasing the risk of losing money and perspective, you will be doom in the long run if you donât master every move in every circumstance which is almost impossible to achieve if you havenât been trading and consistently profitable for a long, very long time.
4. In other words,
you are not delimiting you trading field properly and you are looking for âreasonsâ to explain why this or any other trading plan doesnât work in every single scenario. For example (see chart below) you post that on Wednesday 28th you took 20 trades with a loss of -28 ticks (-48 including commissions) and when I check this chart I was surprise to find there were only 14 round waves (H and L) during the whole day
meaning that you not only trade every single wave but you took 6 trades over that simple limit (overtrading).
5.
Moreover, from the 14 waves available there were ONLY 8 trades that respected price analysis. 6 blue arrow winners with few ticks drawdown and 2 bad brown arrow trades with 12 ticks loss (each). The first brown arrow was a real failure because it broke the ânatural stopâ and the second was a whipsaw because it never broke the last swing low and it was confirmed a few bars after. Discussing how to âavoidâ (or how to accept the cost of doing business) itâs not the main issue here, the point is that you took 12 trades above this second basic limit.
6. In my opinion, the obvious result of failing to comprehend the basic premises in a PBP (minimizing risk, order or analysis, delimiting your Trading Field and price analysis) is having
thousand of doubts and poor consistency and efficiency. Since the 9th of May until the 30th you took +/- 245 trades with 113 tick profit meaning:
1. Your broker made more money than you!!! 2. You average a +/- 2 tick per trade which is inefficient and totally inconsistent with a 500 VOL Chart. 3. You get
overconfident in trending days (thatâs easy) but lose a lot of money in non trading days 16th 28th and 30th of May which is a dangerous symptom and show
how bad is not respecting or overseeing these basic premises in your PBP when only following an amateurish and basic 1 to 1 R/R of 10 ticks will have put you in profits every single day (+25 ticks on the 28th) (I havenât double check the exact numbers for the other days ...) with at least less than a third of trades.
7. My only advice is that before you go crazy tweaking, changing and inventing better triggers and indicators, just try to analysis these macro issues first, only when you fully understand these premises in your PBP you will be able to âimproveâ the real problems, otherwise you are only delaying the failure of your PBP.
I hope it helps
jjrvat