Day trading 0DTE Condors

It’s hard to figure out, do your stats match his?
The hitrate is about the same, average profits per day are good. I only open 1 each day (at 9:45), he opens a lot more and closes sometimes in an early stage. Backtest is mechanical, he is trading on own rules..
 
The hitrate is about the same, average profits per day are good. I only open 1 each day (at 9:45), he opens a lot more and closes sometimes in an early stage. Backtest is mechanical, he is trading on own rules..
What is your data source / provider: do you use real data or simulated data (GBM)?
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
Interesting results, indeed.

He trades ShortIronCondor (it has 4 legs).
But I think a ShortStraddle (or ShortStrangle) is easier to trade (b/c this has only 2 ShortLegs and no LongLegs), and should give a better result, IMO.
Ie. for 0DTE with such liquid options, buying the protective outer LongStrikes is IMO unnecessary when protective StopLimit order(s) get used --> saves much money, therefore also the result should become much better.

Would be interesting to see some backtest or simulation results comparing both strategies on 0DTE.

I get your point. By using an IC you can exactly determine your max loss (2% of net liq). With naked you had a hard time e.g. in aug 2015 (flash crash). And 80% profit a year should be enough :)
 
Yeah maybe you have only one position open, go naked. But once you have a couple open and have profits for the day, start buying wings?
 
It seems the purpose of the Long legs is a different one, an interesting & funny reasoning:
"It’s important to note that the purpose of the long options is not to limit risk but to minimize the cost of the position so you can collect more premium."
(Source: https://optionstradingiq.com/0-dte-spx-options/ )

Ie. it seems to be a margin issue: the IronCondor seems to require less margin than the said ShortStraddle or ShortStrangle.
Can a margin expert confirm this?
Hmm. could indeed be true, b/c IC caps the losses, ie. is less riskier than the said others.
But the above quote says it's not for this purpose :). Funny and confusing...
 
Last edited:
Of course the margin requirement is significantly less on a condor/fly vs a straddle/strangle


It seems the purpose of the Long legs is a different one, an interesting & funny reasoning:
"It’s important to note that the purpose of the long options is not to limit risk but to minimize the cost of the position so you can collect more premium."
(Source: https://optionstradingiq.com/0-dte-spx-options/ )

Ie. it seems to be a margin issue: the IronCondor seems to require less margin than the said ShortStraddle or ShortStrangle.
Can a margin expert confirm this?
Hmm. could indeed be true, b/c IC caps the losses, ie. is less riskier than the said others.
But the above quote says it's not for this purpose :). Funny and confusing...
 
Back
Top