For such a so called racist country, the US elected President Barack Obama to 8 years in the White House. Whites overwhelming voted for Obama. Nobody was complaining about racism then. Then, President Donald Trump got elected on November 8, 2016 into the White House and extreme liberal political hack Van Jones called it a White Lash. Take note, the same white voters who elected President Barack Obama to two terms are now all racist for voting for President Donald Trump? Just because President Donald Trump was white? Such utter BS by the extreme liberal Democrats in office. They cannot get their stories straight if their lives depended on it because all they know is how to lie, lie some more and then, still add more lies. If telling numerous lies could kill you, all these Democrats and their political hacks in liberal media would all be dead already.
Data to support the theory that America is a White Supremacist Country
- Thread starter Tsing Tao
- Start date
Notice how exGop, Tonys dark and all of their other Democratic ANTIFA friends at ET are not even trying to dismantle this thread or what it states at all since they have no rebuttal whatsoever. Or maybe they are just crying their eyes out watching the funeral of their good man Floyd? He was such a good man. All men should aspire to be just like him in every way. He is the new Jesus of our time you know. Not that I like what the pigs did to him...
Its hard to argue with solid facts. Solid facts aren't emotional and don't care about your emotions. Tony put me on ignore a long time ago because he was unable to debate me and claimed I was being insulting to him (despite the fact so many people on here have much, much more profane exchanges with him). He simply couldn't debate. Same with Here4money, usualname, etc. These types of threads are poison to their belief, and they can't argue against them. So they block them to prevent seeing them.
I am taking the very first item, of your very first point, and, like the Camden Police Dept., dismantling it. I could do this to all of your points, but it'll never, ever, resonate in your mind.
I do this one item to illustrate to the readers the importance of due diligence, and logical thinking, and considering all factors, not just the ones you prefer to consider.
That said, have you ever considered the wealth, and education the immigrants brought with them? Of course you didn't.
A roommate I had in college was Indian, and came from a very wealthy family.
_____________
Success of Indians in the U.S. showcases importance of education
https://news.ucsc.edu/2017/06/singh-book.html
"... Since 1965, the selection process in India has favored the most privileged members of society—those from the educated, upper classes—and U.S. immigration policies further advantaged high-achieving students and skilled workers. ..."
______________
Saying the US has a problem with racism, is not the same as saying everyone, or a majority, of its citizens are racists. It is not saying that Blacks can't succeed.
You use a lot of logical fallacies in your arguments.
Fortunately, the majority of White people in the US are normal, and aren't interested in defending obvious racism, like you and your cohorts here are.
Here's an example of Blacks succeeding, a while back, only to be destroyed and killed by racist Whites, including the in-actions of the Police and Fire Departments. Maybe you were there? You likely didn't and won't read about it in history books:
The massacre of Tulsa's "Black Wall Street"
So yeah, Blacks don't need you to let them know that they can succeed.
Racism against Blacks is not necessarily equivalent to racism against other minorities.
Racism harms black people most. It’s time to recognise ‘anti-blackness’
https://www.theguardian.com/comment...cism-anti-blackness-discrimination-minorities
"There is a tendency to classify all victims of racism under the label “people of colour” or “black, Asian and minority ethnic” people (shortened to BAME). However, this generalist approach fails to account for the varied ways that racism affects different races. There is anti-black racism, anti-Asian racism (which affects east Asians and south Asians differently), anti-Arab racism, even sometimes anti-white racism. To be clear, all these strands of racism are significant, and we need to work to eradicate them all. Yet, historically, it’s black people who have most often found themselves at the bottom of the pile. ..."
By the way, if there were no such things as Blacks, racist would find another factor with which to hate and discriminate with, as illustrated in this brown eye/blue eye experiment:
What happened to you as a child?
I do this one item to illustrate to the readers the importance of due diligence, and logical thinking, and considering all factors, not just the ones you prefer to consider.
That said, have you ever considered the wealth, and education the immigrants brought with them? Of course you didn't.
A roommate I had in college was Indian, and came from a very wealthy family.
_____________
Success of Indians in the U.S. showcases importance of education
https://news.ucsc.edu/2017/06/singh-book.html
"... Since 1965, the selection process in India has favored the most privileged members of society—those from the educated, upper classes—and U.S. immigration policies further advantaged high-achieving students and skilled workers. ..."
______________
Saying the US has a problem with racism, is not the same as saying everyone, or a majority, of its citizens are racists. It is not saying that Blacks can't succeed.
You use a lot of logical fallacies in your arguments.
Fortunately, the majority of White people in the US are normal, and aren't interested in defending obvious racism, like you and your cohorts here are.
Here's an example of Blacks succeeding, a while back, only to be destroyed and killed by racist Whites, including the in-actions of the Police and Fire Departments. Maybe you were there? You likely didn't and won't read about it in history books:
The massacre of Tulsa's "Black Wall Street"
So yeah, Blacks don't need you to let them know that they can succeed.
Racism against Blacks is not necessarily equivalent to racism against other minorities.
Racism harms black people most. It’s time to recognise ‘anti-blackness’
https://www.theguardian.com/comment...cism-anti-blackness-discrimination-minorities
"There is a tendency to classify all victims of racism under the label “people of colour” or “black, Asian and minority ethnic” people (shortened to BAME). However, this generalist approach fails to account for the varied ways that racism affects different races. There is anti-black racism, anti-Asian racism (which affects east Asians and south Asians differently), anti-Arab racism, even sometimes anti-white racism. To be clear, all these strands of racism are significant, and we need to work to eradicate them all. Yet, historically, it’s black people who have most often found themselves at the bottom of the pile. ..."
By the way, if there were no such things as Blacks, racist would find another factor with which to hate and discriminate with, as illustrated in this brown eye/blue eye experiment:
What happened to you as a child?
See quote.
Racebaiting is profitable. That's why it's so rampant. It's an effective way to club people into ideological comformity despite the data demonstrating their wide-reaching and broad generalized complaints about whites are basically non-issues when viewed per capita and even less so when split by socioeconomic status. For last the decade even questioning nearly baseless contrived-in-a-social-science-lab statistics was enough to cost you your livelihood. Cancel culture spawned from the malicious manipulation of non per-capita statistics to drive home, indoctrinate, and enforce ideological savagery. The modern day salem witch trials. Except instead of seeing if you weigh as much as 10 chickens they need only look at your skin color to accuse you of racism. If that doesn't work you're suffering from "white fragility" or "crypto white supremacy". The implication being anyone who doesn't wholly conform to their dogma is immediately in the same group of people as bayou hillbillies (and even THAT'S a stereotype).
Nothing you said disagreed with his point. We are fortunate we can post here under pseudonyms.
Congratulations you played yourself.
Last edited:
Now that you've gotten that off your chest.
Exactly which point, statement, etc. that I posted is false, and why? Take your time.
Can you even read. I said you agreed with his statistics and were blinded by your righteous indignation.
Which statistics did I agree with? Maybe I did; maybe I didn't. I can't argue your point for you. Be clear.
You simply made a point that immigrants came to the US seeking a better life and a sure fire way to achieve that life was through hard work and education , which they either brought with them , or acquired here.
Nothing wrong with that and the pay scale confirms that.
About the US being a White Supremacist Country , I think it'll be hard to find a single person of salt who'd say that the US is a White Supremacist Country , the OP himself said there are whites who consider themselves supremacists or who are racists . . . . Yes , and racists some in all sizes , colors and creeds . . . That is true.
All countries have them.
So , i don't know why they are they asking leftists to challenge their little theory . Could be for the drama , I don't know.
But the one thing the above chart confirms is that immigration is certainly good for the country.
That's a good thing. Here's where I differ with the OP.
The OP's position seems to be that immigrants wouldn't be able to earn more than Whites if the US is a racist country, and that only Whites would get ahead.
_________________________
My points:
_________________________
1. Immigrants can earn more than Whites, and still suffer racism.
2. Others can get ahead, and still suffer racism.
3. Calling the country racist is subjective. It is probably better to say that racism exists in the US. Hopefully, the OP isn't saying that racism doesn't exist.
This is from the OP's source:
_________________________
Likely explanations:
_________________________
https://www.financialsamurai.com/income-by-race-why-is-asian-income-so-high/
[emphasis added]
Income By Race: Why Is Asian Income So High?
Here’s the short version from an Asian American’s perspective. I’ll share my personal perspective as a Taiwanese-American down below.
1) Smaller population, less “weight.” Asians account for only ~5.5% of the American population. One stark example of the benefits of having a smaller population is to take a look at Singapore and Malaysia. The per capita GDP in Singapore is an impressive $56,000, partly because its easier to take care of and mobilize 5.4 million people than it is to take care of 30 million Malaysians, whose GDP per capita is only $11,000. They used to be one country until Singapore split on August 9, 1965.
2) Asian immigrants who can afford to come to America tend to be wealthier. It costs money to flee a country for better opportunity. My ~22 year old neighbor from China who bought a $2.25M house is an example. If you’re poor, you’re stuck. Because the US is viewed as having some of the best universities in the world, many wealthier Asian parents send their kids here, Australia, and the UK. If you can afford to pay US private school or out-of-state tuition, you are probably wealthier than the median person. There is much less financial aid for international students. In fact, many colleges purposefully try and court international students because they pay top dollar.
3) Tremendous focus on education. Education is emphasized more than anything else in the Asian household. Get good grades, go to college, or else be a disappointment. Ever wonder why there are so many Asian dentists, doctors, and lawyers? More education is correlated with higher income and wealth. A 2013 Nielsen Research Report found that Asian American households have a median net worth of $89,300 compared to $68,800 for overall US households, a 30% difference. Meanwhile, roughly 49% of Asian Americans have Bachelor’s degrees vs. 28% of the general US population, a 75% difference.
4) More working people in each household. How do people afford to live in expensive Hawaii where there are few high paying jobs? Multiple incomes under one roof. It’s not uncommon to see a father, a mother, an adult son and his wife all live together and work. It’s common to see multiple generations under one roof in the Hispanic community as well. Family versus independence from family is highly emphasized.
(more at above url)
_________________________
Yes, Asians do suffer racism.
_________________________
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/the-long-history-of-racism-against-asian-americans-in-the-u-s
The long history of racism against Asian Americans in the U.S.
Apr 9, 2020 11:36 AM EDT
In a recent Washington Post op-ed, former Democratic presidential candidate Andrew Yang called upon Asian Americans to become part of the solution against COVID-19.
In the face of rising anti-Asian racist actions – now at about 100 reported cases per day – Yang implores Asian Americans to “wear red, white, and blue” in their efforts to combat the virus.
Optimistically, before Donald Trump declared COVID-19 as the “Chinese virus,” Yang believed that “getting the virus under control” would rid this country of its anti-Asian racism. But Asian American history, my field of research, suggests a sobering reality.
A history of anti-Asian racism
Up until the eve of the COVID-19 crisis, the prevailing narrative about Asian Americans was one of the model minority.
The model minority concept, developed during and after World War II, posits that Asian Americans were the ideal immigrants of color to the United States due to their economic success.
But in the United States, Asian Americans have long been considered as a threat to a nation that promoted a whites-only immigration policy. They were called a “yellow peril”: unclean and unfit for citizenship in America.
(more at above url)
_________________________
He meant well. He thought he was onto something.
