I stated that I am respectful when respected; and vice versa. What is contrary to that? My response was to your post addresses how I signified against @gaussian . Now, below, you're mysteriously discussing something totally different.
You can never stay focused. You continually change the debate once you have no rebuttal.
There was no rebuttal you could make to me stating I give what I get. So you've expanded the original debate regarding my response to guassian's insults, into being about how I debate.
I don't obfuscate; you just confuse yourself. I also ask for people to clarify themselves, if that's what you're referring to. Give an example of where I've obfuscated. It is senseless to debate general allegations. Present your evidence.
Without more, I simply must deny your overlybroad, general, unspecific allegation.
Ok, you don't do anything I said. Any evidence I present is just going to be argued (to death) by you. Frankly, as with almost all conversations with you, there is no value in that.
Show me where I did this.
This again.
Again, it silly to debate general allegations, but nevertheless:
So, let me get this straight.
You're saying that when I'm accused of saying something that I assert I didn't say; I ask, "where did I say that?"
So instead of trying to understand why you believe that I said something I didn't, I should just start rephrasing what I said, in the hopes that'll you eventually understand, after however many attempts it'll take for me to guess what part is unclear to you;
Rather than just asking you to tell me exactly where the misunderstanding lies?
So instead of trying to understand why I believe you that said something you didn't you instead say something you did and I don't understand why you believe you said something you didn't instead of something you did and this is unclear. Or something. Or whatever. You have a mastery of the English language that only a madman could appreciate. The only thing that would be better is if you did this in a tongue twister. Could you put one together for me?
Again, I only called you a pussy, because you signified first. I didn't cry about what you said, I might have even laughed.
But don't call people names, and then cry when they call you a pussy.
I don't know if you really believe you've ever rattled me. But calling someone that called you out of your name, a pussy; isn't being rattled in my neighborhood. I apologize if I hurt you. If you don't crack jokes on me; I won't crack jokes on you.
If I only wanted to confront, I wouldn't be spending all this time responding to you in a non-confrontational manner.
I remember exactly the moment you're talking about. Something I said caused you to believe I was trolling you. Re-read the exchange from an outsider perspective, and see if your prior words may have had something to do with my response.
I'm not going to call you a pussy right now. Better?
Squawk squawk! Yeah, you're non-confrontational. If you (and only you) say so!