Dalio goes full retard, likes MMT

Anyone who regards Dalio as a "retard" is not all that big on self-awareness.


P.S. Still waiting to hear about those mega-deals and giga-deals you closed:


Go ahead; I'm ready to be dazzled.

As you may recall from this thread https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/intellectual-yet-idiot.330483/page-2, @nooby_mcnoob has a small problem with embellishment, exaggeration, and fabrication when it comes to his personal background. A direct quote from him/her/it when caught in an internal inconsistency... "I misrepresent myself on this forum on purpose, so that it's not obvious to dox me which people have threatened to do before elsewhere."

I've "dealt with big businesses before" as well, heck I just this morning used my JPMorgan Chase issued credit card to buy a water filter for my GE fridge from Amazon. What is that, 3 multi-billion dollar businesses I dealt with, in my underwear sitting on my couch all before finishing my morning coffee no less!

Please, the two of you, dazzle me with your on-topic discussion.
 
As a student of economics and in particular MMT, that is a nice summary article and discussion that was posted. Sadly it is only the MMT economists that have, to date, a correct, comprehensive understanding of fiat money and what the constraints are on its issuance. (Yes, there are constraints!)

Direct mention, though it's inferred, of an important aspect of MMT seems to be missing from the article. And that is that the purchasing power of fiat money is backed by production of goods and services, or said more concisely, fiat money is backed by productivity! In early modern money theory, MMT, the MMT economists were accustomed to thinking in terms of fiat money being backed by labor, however as labor and productivity become increasingly decoupled via automation it has become necessary to think of fiat money as backed by productivity, and ultimately it is the amount of money in circulation relative to productivity that must be regulated if a currency relatively stable in buying power per unit is desired.

And herein lies the problem with these economic theories. They are never "correctly implemented" according to academics. So what happens is the people who will benefit pick and choose the parts that benefit them. In this case, Dalio is aligning with the politicians who salivate at the prospect of even more control over the economy. This benefits him because he understands government control very well.

Since you are guaranteed to have this occur no matter the theory, what is the right thing to do?
 
In this case, Dalio is aligning with the politicians who salivate at the prospect of even more control over the economy. This benefits him because he understands government control very well.
Right. Because Ray Dalio is only in it for himself and doesn't give a shit about anyone else:

https://www.daliophilanthropies.org/

Nothing like the "transparent" Trump whom you evidently admire.
At least he's transparent.

So since Dalio is a "retard," do tell us what you propose.
 
Right. Because Ray Dalio is only in it for himself and doesn't give a shit about anyone else:

https://www.daliophilanthropies.org/

Nothing like the "transparent" Trump whom you evidently admire.


So since Dalio is a "retard," do tell us what you propose.

"Going full retard" is a meme. Please don't calibrate your entire life story on it. If you can't handle it, best to accept that you will litigate words for no reason except to say "gotcha" and go to a thread where that is appreciated.

I believe Dalio wants the best for everyone on the face of it. But Dalio's company Bridgewater is run very much like a socialist government would be run (Google Bridgewater politburo - sounds familiar?). Dalio wants Bridgewater to continue doing well since his family's well-being depends on it. One way to do that is to systemize regulatory capture, which I have no doubt, they have a machine to do. Cohen half systemized insider trading, but sort of got caught. Everyone does it, one way or another.

Besides that, I do have some personal experience that leads me to think they do this but it's inference based on stuff that I would rather not disclose.
 
"Going full retard" is a meme. Please don't calibrate your entire life story on it. If you can't handle it, best to accept that you will litigate words for no reason except to say "gotcha" and go to a thread where that is appreciated.

I believe Dalio wants the best for everyone on the face of it. But Dalio's company Bridgewater is run very much like a socialist government would be run (Google Bridgewater politburo - sounds familiar?). Dalio wants Bridgewater to continue doing well since his family's well-being depends on it. One way to do that is to systemize regulatory capture, which I have no doubt, they have a machine to do. Cohen half systemized insider trading, but sort of got caught. Everyone does it, one way or another.

Besides that, I do have some personal experience that leads me to think they do this but it's inference based on stuff that I would rather not disclose.
Quoting Dalio: To reiterate, we aren’t offering any comments on the relative merits of these; we are just giving you a sense of the range and the number of historical cases that, if we were in the position of policy makers, we would be looking through. This examination process then has to consider what’s legal, and what’s politically acceptable, in each country. It’s a big job to work out what’s best, so that will take time. As a result, we believe that policy makers, especially central bankers, need to work hard on figuring this out now.
If everything he touches on for discussion purposes is without merit, then what do you propose?
 
Last edited:
"Going full retard" is a meme. Please don't calibrate your entire life story on it. If you can't handle it, best to accept that you will litigate words for no reason except to say "gotcha" and go to a thread where that is appreciated.

I believe Dalio wants the best for everyone on the face of it. But Dalio's company Bridgewater is run very much like a socialist government would be run (Google Bridgewater politburo - sounds familiar?). Dalio wants Bridgewater to continue doing well since his family's well-being depends on it. One way to do that is to systemize regulatory capture, which I have no doubt, they have a machine to do. Cohen half systemized insider trading, but sort of got caught. Everyone does it, one way or another.

Besides that, I do have some personal experience that leads me to think they do this but it's inference based on stuff that I would rather not disclose.
Dalio and Bridgewater are definitely very cult-like in how they run their company. However it's an invalid logical leap to state that this means they want the U.S. government to be run in the same manner. From my personal experience the U.S. military is the most socialist organization possible...the government provides your healthcare, housing, food, clothes, even childcare..to each according to their needs. And it tells you what your job will be according to its estimation of your abilities, tells you where to live, which organs you get to keep (wisdom teeth-gone, want them or not, problem or not!), even regulates where you can travel when you're not working and what businesses you can enter (you can literally be put in prison with a felony level conviction for going to Tijuana or your local shop that sells bongs or even certain strip clubs or auto dealers). That's beyond socialism, it's a damn good approximation of full on communism. And yet the folks in the military and military leadership are extremely conservative by and large and the fact that they work in an organization run on communist principles in no way means they advocate for a communist government for the country they defend. You can no more claim that Dalio and the folks at Bridgewater are advocating for a socialist government because of how they internally run their organization than you could say that of the military, it's an utterly absurd statement.
 
Back
Top