And the MSNBC people also contradict themselves when it suits them. How is it any different? It is a different argument, but it is the same hypocrisy.
Someone on fox, lets call her Bimbo "A" comes out and says "Teachers are getting paid to much", then says "we shouldnt block CEO pay."
Someone on MSNBC lets call him Bimbette, "B" or i will just call him "Ed schultz" for short.....
So this fictitious A-hole named "Ed Schultz" constantly degrades tea party protesters as racist thugs and calls wisconsin protestors "Heros."
What is the difference? The difference is that one side doesnt support excessive public sector pay while the other does. Both sides however are engaged in the same kind of media bias/hypocrisy.
Why dont you point out the specific part of the video you are arguing about if this doesnt make sense to you.
Someone on fox, lets call her Bimbo "A" comes out and says "Teachers are getting paid to much", then says "we shouldnt block CEO pay."
Someone on MSNBC lets call him Bimbette, "B" or i will just call him "Ed schultz" for short.....
So this fictitious A-hole named "Ed Schultz" constantly degrades tea party protesters as racist thugs and calls wisconsin protestors "Heros."What is the difference? The difference is that one side doesnt support excessive public sector pay while the other does. Both sides however are engaged in the same kind of media bias/hypocrisy.
Why dont you point out the specific part of the video you are arguing about if this doesnt make sense to you.
Quote from Gabfly1:
For whatever reason, you continue to miss the point. There is no comparison. Attempts at drawing equivalency are false. Have you watched the segment? This is only the most recent in a long line of Twilight Zone submissions for your approval. The FOX people themselves contradict themselves when it suits them. Forget the news story. Just look at the bad talking haircuts on the screen and compare them to themselves from one clip to the next.
