i think a line was crossed with the picture of the 10 year old girl. Thats weird, i dont care who she is, its a picture of a 10 year old girl in a daily hottie thread. lets stick with the legals, even if its barely legal.
Quote from SCI new york:
i think a line was crossed with the picture of the 10 year old girl. Thats weird, i dont care who she is, its a picture of a 10 year old girl in a daily hottie thread. lets stick with the legals, even if its barely legal.
Quote from Optionpro007:
Agree. I still think that your interpretation of 'the picture' is questionable.
Quote from SCI new york:
I will say this again and then I'm off the subject. It's a picture of a 10 year old girl in a daily hottie thread. My interperetation of it is that its inappropriate for this. The questionable one is you. If you haven't noticed, the pictures are of scandilous women not wearing much in a thread where men on this forum want to see half naked girls and then someone for an odd reason decides to post a picture of a 10 year old A.H. You are even stranger for not thinking theres something wrong with that in this thread. I'm not a dirty old man so I dont know if that's your thing but I think its strange. I will no longer comment on this. I prefer to see 25 year old blonde sluts.
IF the young girl was shown barley dressed or referred to in a sexual way I'd be the first to agree.Quote from SCI new york:
i think a line was crossed with the picture of the 10 year old girl. Thats weird, i dont care who she is, its a picture of a 10 year old girl in a daily hottie thread. lets stick with the legals, even if its barely legal.
Quote from Lucrum:
IF the young girl was shown barley dressed or referred to in a sexual way I'd be the first to agree.
BUT IMO it was a very innocent, perfectly acceptable "guess who this is" picture.
In that context I don't see anything wrong with it.
Quote from nitro:
While I believe it was done completely innocently, it is inappropriate. So no foul, just don't do it again.