DACA - anyone have a non-stupid prediction of what Trump will decide?

And it was back to a commie country.

21432875_1161659507301418_2705288317199131646_n.jpg




and notice how when they want to send someone back to a commie country, they make sure and bring machine guns along to blow away anyone who might get in their way.

But if liberal college students riot, the cops are all supposed to put down their guns and stand down, because somebody might get hurt.
 
Last edited:
Trump ran on winning and moving the establishment to his agenda.
No one voted for bipartisan caves.

If we wanted politicians who lie to the base and then vote like democrats we could have voted for Jeb or Kasich or Rubio etc.

this is incredibly poor re election strategy.
He needed to convert the country to winning by insisting on the the implementation of ideas he ran on or calling out Congress as losers.

Now he might get some legislation done but no one will win by the cronies.


He is trading a big base for a very small groups of independents.
This cave just sets up for cave after cave on Obamacare and taxes and immigration. I really thought he had more tenacity.

its looking to me like Paul will have to take him out in the primaries.



TreeFrogTrader said:
Maybe all the people who were hoping to see some bipartisanship as promised.

Just a thought.
More...
 
jem said:
Trump ran on winning and moving the establishment to his agenda.
No one voted for bipartisan caves.
More...

Yeh, I don't know he has to work all that out or not.

He ran on platform of not budging on things BUT also as the supreme dealmaker who could work across party lines and find something that works for both sides as you have to do in the business world- he would and did point out. I have no idea how all that fits together. Apparently neither does his base. As I have said before, I am a Never Hillary voter so I have not taken on the additional task of helping trump to make sense of how what he is doing fits with his base. I have no idea.

You asked who his striking a deal on the debt ceiling would appeal to and I replied that it might appeal the ones who wanted to see some cross party dealmaking bipartisanship. Maybe that is only two people out of the entire country. I dont know. But that's who.
 
TreeFrogTrader said:
Yeh, I don't know he has to work all that out or not.

He ran on platform of not budging on things BUT also as the supreme dealmaker who could work across party lines and find something that works for both sides as you have to do in the business world- he would and did point out. I have no idea how all that fits together. Apparently neither does his base. As I have said before, I am a Never Hillary voter so I have not taken on the additional task of helping trump to make sense of how what he is doing fits with his base. I have no idea.

You asked who his striking a deal on the debt ceiling would appeal to and I replied that it might appeal the ones who wanted to see some cross party dealmaking bipartisanship. Maybe that is only two people out of the entire country. I dont know. But that's who.
More...


Honestly as horrible as I think the guy is, if he ends up uniting the parties against him, he'll have done the country a great service.
 
Here4money said:
Honestly as horrible as I think the guy is, if he ends up uniting the parties against him, he'll have done the country a great service.
More...


He pretty much did that in the campaign. He alienated every republican and democrat establishment type so a lot of voters concluded he was their man and must be doing something right. Be careful what you wish for.
 
i was never hillary too.
but I had hopes trump would not cave to the establishment.
but at least he gave us gorsuch.

TreeFrogTrader said:
He pretty much did that in the campaign. He alienated every republican and democrat establishment type so a lot of voters concluded he was their man and must be doing something right. Be careful what you wish for.
More...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top