CV not even remotely close to being priced in

[trading_jean]

Following this discussion here I am suprised to learn you are a programmer Turveyd.
Based on the way you construct your arguments it seems to me you are a strong independent thinker that has not been spoiled by the traditional education system. Did you by any chance become a programmer through self-study?

 

[d08]

Not wasting time, with someone who can't understand the concept of LATER!! FFS

The Longer you delay the spread, the more time the at risk have of catching it and dying, that's yourside, your killing people, well done!!

There is no guarantee that it will arrive later. Also later can mean when there's already a vaccine. Even today, you have better chances of surviving than a few months ago because we know more about the virus.

Stop assuming it will just arrive later. You have no basis.

Sweden has pretty much admitted it made a huge mistake at first, yet there's still people like yourself defending bad decisions.

 

[Turveyd]

There is no guarantee that it will arrive later. Also later can mean when there's already a vaccine. Even today, you have better chances of surviving than a few months ago because we know more about the virus.

Stop assuming it will just arrive later. You have no basis.

Sweden has pretty much admitted it made a huge mistake at first, yet there's still people like yourself defending bad decisions.

No, It will arrive later, you'd have to lock the country away for many years till a vaccine, which is fine for small isolated country early on, but US and UK are already well beyond this.

No Sweden, admitted they could of sheilded care homes better and have improved that, nothing more, 100% happy with there method. There daily deaths are in the 20's, there deaths compared to NYC same population are wayyyy lower

Norway's PM has said she's or he, sorry she didn't go down Sweden's route because the damage to the country has been huge economically, but she'd seen Italy and was too scared.

Your way is valid if we are 5% into this like the media is pushing with 20x's more deaths to come, but there is nothing to back that up, it's just fear mongering, UK it's over, we know it's over, hell hospitals are empty, but still lockdown hell.

 

[Turveyd]

Before you accuse above of being a lie.

https://au.news.yahoo.com/coronavir...hQXG4CbKG0Pf1v7uMnUiLdRhckz8NEDK_12L3vkV1C_-x

Incase OMG it's Yahoo LOL

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/05/30/coronavirus-norway-wonders-should-have-like-sweden/

Obviously, you'll ignore this, because it doesn't fit in with your narrative and your just a TROLL!!

 

[d08]

Before you accuse above of being a lie.

https://au.news.yahoo.com/coronavir...hQXG4CbKG0Pf1v7uMnUiLdRhckz8NEDK_12L3vkV1C_-x

Incase OMG it's Yahoo LOL

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/05/30/coronavirus-norway-wonders-should-have-like-sweden/

Obviously, you'll ignore this, because it doesn't fit in with your narrative and your just a TROLL!!

I'm still waiting for your proof that "most countries" will suffer a GDP drop of 30% this year. Where is it?

No, It will arrive later, you'd have to lock the country away for many years till a vaccine, which is fine for small isolated country early on, but US and UK are already well beyond this.

UK and US have leaders who are way too slow and inadequate, that's why. While countries in Asia were locking down hard, Brits were going around like nothing happened. It has nothing to do with size as population density is much higher in most of Asia than the UK, never mind US.

The Norwegian PM's opinion doesn't really matter, the numbers tell the story. Many Norwegians are alive because of the cautious strategy they implemented.

 

[Turveyd]

I'm still waiting for your proof that "most countries" will suffer a GDP drop of 30% this year. Where is it?



UK and US have leaders who are way too slow and inadequate, that's why. While countries in Asia were locking down hard, Brits were going around like nothing happened. It has nothing to do with size as population density is much higher in most of Asia than the UK, never mind US.

The Norwegian PM's opinion doesn't really matter, the numbers tell the story. Many Norwegians are alive because of the cautious strategy they implemented.

Still wait for you to.prove they won't.

So your opinion your stating as FACT which is allowed because its yours is better than the PM of the country who openly states huge damage done.

The unemployed living in poverty is fine, got it.


Troll goodbye, your a disgusting humam barely being.

Troll

Troll

 

[d08]

Still wait for you to.prove they won't.

That is not how any of it works. Onus is on the person making the claim, not the opposite. Do we really need to sink to basics?

So your opinion your stating as FACT which is allowed because its yours is better than the PM of the country who openly states huge damage done.

PM said she would have done things somewhat differently. Never said "huge damage done". Again, you're lying but you seem to be unstoppable.

Are you on any psychoactive medication? If yes, I'll leave it be.

 

[Same Lazy Element]

@hoffmanw, some of the stuff you quote turned out to be less scary (like multiple reinfections are specific to immuno-compromised), some is definitely true.

However, as a pragmatic society, sooner or later we will decide that the societal cost is not worth the extra lives saved (especially since most people agree that we are just delaying most of the deaths as opposed to preventing them). It’s sad but it’s the reality - we have done it for other sources of mortality. Notable examples are HIV/AIDS which killed 700k in the US and over 30 million globally, malaria which has killed hundreds of millions globally or even something as trivial as suicides which has been steadily rising.

The exception here is that the vulnerable population is, coincidentally, also the richest age bracket of the society and the key voting segment of the population. So it’s gonna take more pain to arrive at the point where we gonna throw in the towel. I just hope that this transition to not-caring is gradual as opposed to a step function. However, it’s gonna happen - and if it does not, the younger generations that are being fucked over will force it in the worst way possible.

 

[Turveyd]

That is not how any of it works. Onus is on the person making the claim, not the opposite. Do we really need to sink to basics?



PM said she would have done things somewhat differently. Never said "huge damage done". Again, you're lying but you seem to be unstoppable.

Are you on any psychoactive medication? If yes, I'll leave it be.

Your a Troll, keep your Trolling to the weekend.

Pretty sure you need the medication.

The news clearly states DAMAGE!

 

[Turveyd]

@hoffmanw, some of the stuff you quote turned out to be less scary (like multiple reinfections are specific to immuno-compromised), some is definitely true.

However, as a pragmatic society, sooner or later we will decide that the societal cost is not worth the extra lives saved (especially since most people agree that we are just delaying most of the deaths as opposed to preventing them). It’s sad but it’s the reality - we have done it for other sources of mortality. Notable examples are HIV/AIDS which killed 700k in the US and over 30 million globally, malaria which has killed hundreds of millions globally or even something as trivial as suicides which has been steadily rising.

The exception here is that the vulnerable population is, coincidentally, also the richest age bracket of the society and the key voting segment of the population. So it’s gonna take more pain to arrive at the point where we gonna throw in the towel. I just hope that this transition to not-caring is gradual as opposed to a step function. However, it’s gonna happen - and if it does not, the younger generations that are being fucked over will force it in the worst way possible.

D08 he's agreeing with me, go troll him instead!